Role of the Industrial Complex for the Country’s Sovereignty in the New World Order and Emergence of the IT Industry After Digital Transformation of Society
DOI: 10.33917/es-1.167.2020.82-91
The quality of industrial complex (IC) is crucial for the country’s sovereignty and the living standard of people in the context of survival and development in the new world order. Therefore, IC is increasingly becoming an object of competition and an instrument of some countries’ pressure on the other. However, the terms “industry” and “industrial complex” in the scientific economic community and government bodies do not have a generally accepted scientific definition. It is important to understand that the IT model of a developed state, with regard to digital transformation, should also include IT and a socio-strategic unit. Given these factors, the structure of an ideal IC model of a developed state in the emerging information society is proposed. The IC structure, along with industrial groups A and B (the means of production and consumer goods) includes new industry groups: C + D groups (manufacturing universal products — energy-electricity and information-knowledge) and X group (production of public and collective goods contributing to the state goals).
References:
|
1. Pilipenko E.V., Grinyuk K.P. Promyshlennost’ i promyshlennyi kompleks v ekonomicheskoi nauke: problem teorii [Industry and Industrial Complex in Economic Science: Problems of Theory]. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. Vestnik Volgogradskogo instituta biznesa, 2013, no 3. 2. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie (struktura, istoricheskaya evolyutsiya) [Theoretical Knowledge (Structure, Historical Evolution)]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, 2000, pp. 408–411. 3. Ryzhov V.A., Novotochinov A.A., Fadeeva T.I. Evolyutsiya i strukturnyi sdvig roli IT, ili K voprosu obustroistva “intellektual’nykh mestorozhdenii” i sud’bakh “intellektual’nykh” reform [Information Technology Evolution and the Shift of its Structural Role, or On the Question of “Intellectual Deposits” Development and About the Fates of “Intellectual” Reforms]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2015, no 7, pp. 60–73. 4. Ageev A.I., Avdeev S.V., Novotochinov A.A., Ryzhov V.A., Fadeeva T.I. IBM kak zerkalo mirovoi evolyutsii IT i prishestvie Vtoroi informatsionnoi revolyutsii. Skrytye intellektual’nye pruzhiny i vozmozhnye tekhnologicheskie i gumanitarnye tormoza i posledstviya [IBM as a Mirror of the Global IT Evolution and Advent of the Second Information Revolution. Hidden Intellectual Springs, Possible Technological and Humanitarian Brakes, Expected Implications]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2016, no 4, pp. 84–107. |