Cognitive Limits of Scientific Thinking
Keywords:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
In the process of development, the scientific (natural philosophy, Baconian) perception paradigm faces at least two cognitive limits, the first of which is due to insufficient dimension of human thinking, its inability to accommodate all scientific knowledge (Leibnitz limit), and the second is related to internal paradox and latent groundlessness of the paradigm itself.
References:
- Pereslegin S.B. Effekt “chuzhogo polya”: rossiiskaya nauka v anglo-saksonskom kognitivnom prostranstve [Effect of the “Foreign Field”: Russian Science in Anglo-Saxon Cognitive Space]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2017, no 8, pp. 50–65.
- Zel’dovich Ya.B., Yaglom I.M. Vysshaya matematika dlya nachinayushchikh fizikov i tekhnikov [Higher Mathematics for Beginner Physicists and Technicians]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, 512 p.
- Pereslegin S.B. Problema strategirovaniya razvitiya nauchnykh issledovanii v RF v svete trebovanii Federal’nogo zakona N 172-FZ “O strategicheskom planirovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [The Problem of Strategizing Scientific Research Development in the Russian Federation]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2017, no 1, pp. 60–71.
- Krest’yaninov Ya.A. Paradoksy teorii mnozhestv [Set Theory Paradoxes]. Rusnauka, available at: http://www.rusnauka.com/10_DN_2013/Matemathics/4_132104.doc.htm.
- Krizis osnovanii matematiki [Crisis of Mathematics Foundations]. Vikipediya. available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Кризис_оснований_математики.
- Galaktionov M.R. Marnskoe srazhenie [Battle of the Marne]. Moscow, Voenizdat, 1938, 80 p.