About the possibility of using a scenario approach in forecasting and budgeting in the practice of corporate governance of PJSC Aeroflot
DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.102.2022.83-90
The article discusses the possibilities of using a scenario approach in forecasting and budgeting in the practice of corporate governance of PJSC Aeroflot. According to the methodology of the National Corporate Governance Rating in 2018, Aeroflot PJSC has a rating of 7++, which indicates compliance with Russian legislation, taking into account the interests of all interested parties (shareholders, the state, employees, consumers of services). Currently, it is established that in 2020-2021. This aspect of corporate governance in PJSC Aeroflot is not fully implemented and needs to be improved. It can be assumed that precisely because of this, the risk management system of PJSC Aeroflot could not cope with the development of anti-crisis measures in a timely manner. The authors recommend considering pessimistic and optimistic scenarios in detail when drawing up budgets, planning a budget system for each of them, developing measures to reduce risks, and responding quickly to emerging threats. It has been established that the use of a scenario approach in budgeting and corporate governance practices will allow PJSC Aeroflot to consider all possible situations, including unlikely ones, to inform representatives of the Board of Directors about all possible risks in a timely manner, and to develop measures to minimize risk.
References:
1. Alenina E.E., Zyulina V.V., Redin D.V. Priority directions of formation of organizational structures of innovative development of high-tech industries. In the collection: Innovations in business creation and management. Materials of the VIII International Scientific Conference of teachers, staff and Graduate students. 2016. pp. 3-8. (In Russ.).
2. Alenina E.E., Zyulina V.V. Sectoral problems of management of the development of modern Russian engineering. In the collection: Materials of the Scientific and practical conference with international participation «Management in the field of science, education and technological development». 2016. pp. 134-140. (In Russ.).
3. Golovanova N.B., Gorin D.S. Methodological approach to assessing the technological state of a machine-building enterprise to increase the validity of management decisions //Management of economic systems: an electronic scientific journal. 2012;4 (40):70. (In Russ.).
4. Golovanova N.B., Gorina T.V. Comparative characteristics of the main approaches to enterprise resource management //Management of economic systems: an electronic scientific journal. 2014;12 (72):83. (In Russ.).
5. Gorin D.S. The growth of the technological gap as a trend in the development of the machine-building industry //Economics and entrepreneurship. 2014;11-4 (52): 503-505. (In Russ.).
6. Gorin D.S. Assessment of the industry significance of machine-building enterprises based on the analysis of fixed assets //Economics and entrepreneurship. 2013;12-4(41):319-322. (In Russ.).
7. Gorin D.S. Organizational and methodological aspects of crisis management at machine-building enterprises //Economics and entrepreneurship. 2012;1(24):282-285. (In Russ.).
8. Gorina T.V. Modern view on the problem of product quality management //Economics and entrepreneurship. 2015;4-2 (57):890-892. (In Russ.).
9. Zyulina V.V. Improvement of ways to increase the innovativeness of machine-building enterprises //Innovation and investment. 2014;3:19-23. (In Russ.).
10. Kozhina V.O. Features of the influence of transnational corporations on the processes of globalization in the Russian economy //Economics and entrepreneurship. 2016;2-2(67):31-35. (In Russ.).
11. Loiko A.O., Alenina E.E. The influence of the international political situation on the competitiveness of the national machine-building industry //Izvestia of MSTU MAMI. 2015;5(4 (26)):33-36. (In Russ.).
12. Matyunina O.E., Kozhina V.O., Zhakevich A.G., Afanasyeva Yu.S., Lebedeva O.E. Improvement of financial support of joint-stock companies //Economics and entrepreneurship. 2017;4-1(81):837-840. (In Russ.).
13. Taleb N.N. Black Swan. Under the sign of unpredictability / translated from the English by V. Sonkin, A. Berdichevsky, M. Kostionova, O. Popov; edited by M. Tyunkina. M.: Kolibri, 2009. 528 p. (In Russ.).
14. Taleb N.N. About the secrets of sustainability. In the footsteps of the black swan. The foreigner, 2012. 240 p. (In Russ.).
15. Taleb N.N. Antifragility. How to benefit from chaos / translated from English by N. Karaeva. M.: KoLibri Publishing House, ABC-Atticus, 2014. 768 p. (In Russ.).
16. Taleb N.N. Risking his own skin. The hidden asymmetry of everyday life / translated from English by N. Karaeva. M.: KoLibri, ABC-Atticus, 2018. 380 p. (In Russ.).
17. Filatov V.V., Alekseev A.E., Dibrova Zh.N., et al. Methodology of management of economic integration and concentration on the example of the organization of a vertically integrated holding. Publishing house: Closed Joint Stock Company «University Book» (Kursk), 2016. (In Russ.).
18. Filatov V.V., Kobiashvili N.A., Music M.Yu., Kosikova Yu.A., etc. Design of information systems for managing business processes of enterprises of the machine-building complex. Textbook, Moscow, 2020. (In Russ.).
19. Filatov V.V., Alekseev A.E., Shlenov Yu.V., Vorobyev D.I., etc. Machine-building complex of the Russian Federation: sectoral, regional and strategic aspects of development. Monograph Kursk, 2017. (In Russ.).
20. Official website of the company «Aeroflot». URL: https://www.aeroflot.ru /
21. Aeroflot in 2020 received a loss of almost 100 billion rubles. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/business/news/2021/02/04/856699-aeroflot-v-2020-godu-poluchil-ubitok-pochti-v-100-mlrd-rublei
22. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the activities of the Board of Directors. URL: https://www.ey.com/ru_ru/news/2020/08/ey-skolkovo-board-of-directors-survey