DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.88-95

Numerous works on mathematical modeling of the society structure, group formation and dissemination of information do not provide a single consistent model that includes all the empirically discovered properties of society that act as modeling limitations. In this work a mathematical model of stable states of a social body is constructed, it allows us to analyze and predict the controllability of a social body.

References:

1. Aleev R.Z. Higman’s central unit theory, units of integral group rings of finite cyclic groups and Fibonacci numbers. Intern. Journal Algebra and Computations, 1994, vol. 4, pp. 309–358.

2. Bollobas B. Random Graphs. Cambridge Univ. Press, Second Edition, 2001.

3. Bogomolnaia A., Le Breton M., Savvateev A., Weber S. Heterogeneity Gap in Unidimensional Spatial Models. Journal of Public Economic Theory, vol.10, iss. 3, pp. 455–473; CORE Discussion Paper, 2006/36.

4. Bourgain J., Lindenstrauss J. On covering a set in R d by balls of the same diameter. Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis, Lecture Notes in Math., 1469. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991, pp. 138–144.

5. Duncan J. Watts Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. Norton, 2003.

6. Milgram S. The Small World Problem. Psychology Today, 1967.

7. Raigorodskii A.M. On a problem in the geometry of numbers. Trudy Instituta matematiki, 2007, no 15(1), pp. 111–117.

8. Garin E.V., Meshcheryakov R.V. Model’ upravleniya sotsiumom [Society Control Model]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 2017, no 1, available at: http://uptp.ru/articles/tochka-zreniya/2214/

9. Garin E.V., Meshcheryakov R.V. Method for Determination of the Social Graph Orientation by the Analysis of the Vertices Valence in the Connectivity Component. Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series of “Mathematics. Mechanics. Physics”, 2017, vol. 9, no 4, pp. 5–12.

10. Garin E.V. Eksperimental’noe opredelenie znacheniya predela perkolyatsii, pri kotorom prekrashchaetsya rasprostranenie informatsii v sotsiume: Sovremennye tekhnologii v nauke i obrazovanii — STNO-2018: Sb. trudov mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-tekhnicheskogo foruma [Experimental Determining the Value of the Percolation Limit at which the Information Dissemination in Society Stops: Modern Technologies in Science and Education — STNO-2018:

Collection of Proceedings of the International Scientific and Technical Forum]. Vol. 5. Ryazan’, Ryazanskiy gosudarstvennyy radiotekhnicheskiy university, 2018, 234 p.

11. Garin E.V. Modelэ stroeniya sotsiuma s obratnoy svyaz’yu: Mir Vostoka i Mir Zapada: Sb. statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 25 aprelya 2018 g. [Model of the Society Architecture with Feedback: The World of the East and the World of the West: Collection of articles of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. April 25, 2018]. Ufa, Izd-vo UGNTU, 2018, 584 p.

12. Garin E.V. Perkolyatsionnaya model’ kommunikatsii s mekhanizmom izbiratel’nogo vospriyatiya informatsii (ob”yasnenie fenomena reklamnoy glukhoty) [Percolation Model of Communication with the Mechanism of Selective Information Perception (Explanation of the Advertising Deafness Phenomenon)]. Kommunikatsii. Media. Dizayn, 2021, vol. 6, no 1, pp. 39–63.

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.96-107

The article identifies dynamics of the Eurasian concept, which is considered as the basic strategy for the positive development of Russia’s foreseeable future. The author shows that over the last century the national Eurasian model has been transformed in the process of actual socio-economic and political-ideological attitudes. Within classical eurasianism Russia is viewed as a special geographical and socio-cultural civilization that combines Western (Western European) and Eastern (Asian) stereotypes.

It is proved that in the process of the USSR development and formation of the “new” Russia, the theory of eurasianism with a Western European trend was being implemented. Since the second decade of the 21st century, in order to overcome the consequences of anti-Russian sanctions, the Russian Federation has been stimulating a national strategy of Eurasianism with an Eastern (Asian) orientation. However, by the middle of the 21st century in implementing the conceptual model of Eurasianism Russia will return, as suggested in the article, to a classical strategy based on a balance of Westernization and Orientalist ideas.

References:

10. Gumilev L.N. Zametki poslednego evraziytsa [Notes from the Last Eurasian]. Nashe nasledie,1991, no 3, pp. 19–26.

11. Gumilev L.N. “Menya nazyvayut evraziytsem…” [“They Call me a Eurasian…”]. Nash sovremennik, 1991, no 1, pp. 62–70.

12. Likhachev D.S. O natsional’nom kharaktere russkikh [On the National Character of Russians]. Voprosy filosofii, 1990, no 4, pp. 3–6.

13. Polynov M.F. Gonka vooruzheniy kak metod izmatyvaniya SSSR SShA. 1945–1990 gg. [The Arms Race as a Method of Exhausting the USSR and the USA. 1945–1990]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2005, Seriya 2, no 3, pp. 92–103.

14. L’vov D.S. Ekonomika razvitiya [Economics of Development]. Moscow, Ekzamen, 2002.

15. Prokhanov A.A., Glaz’ev S.Yu. Kholodnaya voyna 2.0. Strategiya russkoy pobedy [Cold War 2.0. Russian victory strategy]. Moscow, Knizhnyy mir, 2015, 384 p.

16. Maslov A. Kitayskiy vektor Rossii [Chinese Vector of Russia]. Kommersant”, 2022, 4 fevralya, no 20.

17. Dugin A. My voyuem s tsivilizatsiey Antikhrista [We are at War with the Civilization of the Antichrist]. Izborskiy klub, 2022, 4 maya.

18. Gumilev L.N. Skazhu Vam po sekretu, chto, esli Rossiya budet spasena, tol’ko cherez evraziystvo [I’ll tell you a Secret that if Russia is Saved, it will only be Through Eurasianism]. Sotsium,1992, no 9, p. 89.

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.108-115

The purpose of the study is to develop the bases of a methodology for compatibility of paradigms of society and its subsystems based on the compatibility of human needs and social values. The growing paradigmatic field of society is examined. The author studies expanded composition of the society subsystems based on the spheres of its life activity. He also defines and presents the compatibility of the society subsystems and the subsystems of an organization as a “unit” of society. A list of the main paradigms in the hierarchy of society subsystems is compiled. The role and significance of the methodology fundamentals for compatibility of the society paradigms are substantiated.

References:

1. Spenser G. Sotsial’naya statika [Social Statics]. Moscow, Yurayt, 2023, 424 p.

2. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Vol. 2. Samosoznanie evropeyskoy kul’tury XX veka [The Decline of Europe. Vol. 2. Self-awareness of the European Culture of the Twentieth Century]. Moscow, IPL, 1991.

3. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow, AST, 2020, 320 p.

4. Toynbi A. Issledovanie istorii. Vozniknovenie, rost i raspad tsivilizatsiy [A Study of History. The Emergence, Growth and Disintegration of Civilizations]. Moscow, AST: AST MOSKVA, 2009.

5. Bondarenko O.Ya. Sbornik dokladov po teorii i filosofii edinogo polya (Podgot. na osnove serii knig “Filosofiya Edinstva”) [Collection of Reports on the Theory and Philosophy of the Unified Field. (Podgot. based on the Book Series “Philosophy of Unit y”)]. Bishkek, 2000.

6. Deyl S. Tonkoe telo. Polnaya entsiklopediya bioenergeticheskoy meditsiny [The Thin Body. The Complete Encyclopedia of Bioenergetic Medicine]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2013.

7. Maslou A. Motivatsiya i lichnost’ [Motivation and Personalit y]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Piter, 2013, 351 p.

8. Berezina T.N. Rezervnye vozmozhnosti cheloveka [Human Reserve Capabilitie]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2000.

9. Morozov V.A. Sovmestimost’ sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem. Osnovy teorii sovmestimosti [Compatibility of Socio-economic Systems. Fundamentals of the Theory of Compatibility]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 2013.

10. Panov P.V. Instituty, identichnosti, praktiki: teoreticheskaya model’ politicheskogo poryadka [Institutions, Identities, Practices: a Theoretical Model of the Political Order]. Moscow, Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2011, 230 p.

11. Kleyner G.B. Strategiya predpriyatiya [Enterprise Strategy]. Moscow, Delo, 2008.

12. Morozov V.A. Obshchestvo i ekonomika vzaimodeystviya [Society and Economics of Interaction]. Monografiya. Vol. 2. Moscow, Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2017.

13. Morozov V.A. Dukhovnaya ekonomika i sovmestimost’ obshchestva. Teoriya sovmestimosti [Spiritual Economy and Compatibility of Society. Compatibility Theory]. Moscow, Izdatel’sko-torgovaya korporatsiya “Dashkov i K°”, 2021, DOI: 10.29030/978-5-394-04571-4-2021-5-577.

14. Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. N.Y., Oxford Universit y Press, 1996.

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.116-123

The author of the article analyzes trends in the development of innovation activity from 2005 to 2021 in the six largest urban agglomerations of Russia — Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nizhny Novgorod, Kazan, Yekaterinburg and Novosibirsk. As a result of the study, it was determined that in order to further realize the innovative potential of the largest urban agglomerations as sources of economic growth of the country, it is necessary to finance and support industries engaged in innovative types of economic activities, develop mechanisms for integrating science and business, build and develop inter-agglomeration (interregional) connections and cooperation in scientific-technological development.

References:

1. Aganbegyan A.G. O prioritetnom razvitii sfery ekonomiki znaniy [On the Priority Development of the Knowledge Economy Sphere]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, 2021, no 1(67), pp. 15–22, DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2021-1-67-15-22

2. Ushvitskiy L.I., Ter-Grigor’yants A.A., Rebiy A.P. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya innovatsionnykh protsessov v rossiyskoy ekonomike [Modern Trends in the Development of Innovation Processes in the Russian Economy]. Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo federal’nogo universiteta, 2017, no 2(59), pp. 120–128.

3. Shamina L.K. Vliyanie ekonomicheskoy kon”yunktury na innovatsionnuyu aktivnost’ otechestvennykh predpriyatiy [Influence of the Economic Situation on the Innovation Activity of Domestic Enterprises]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, 2021, no 4(70), pp. 147–155, DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.37930/1990-9780-2021-4-70-147-155

4. Kochetkov S.V., Kochetkova O.V. Innovatsionnoe sostoyanie ekonomiki regiona kak glavnoe uslovie snizheniya mezhterritorial’nogo neravenstva [Innovative State of the Regional Economy as the Main Condition for Reducing Interterritorial Inequality]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, 2023, no 1(75), pp. 50–55, DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2023-1-75-50-55

5. Mikhaylov A.S., Kuznetsova T.Yu., Peker I.Yu. Tipologiya regionov po ikh funktsional’noy roli v innovatsionnom prostranstve Rossii [Typology of Regions According to their Functional Role in the Innovation Space of Russia]. Regional’nye issledovaniya, 2019, no 4, pp. 46–57, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2019-4-4

6. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 13 fevralya 2019 g. N 207-r “Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2025 goda” [Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of February 13, 2019 No. 207-r “Strategy for spatial development of the Russian Federation

for the period until 2025”], available at: http://static.government.ru/media/files/UVAlqUtT08o60RktoOXl22JjAe7irNxc.pdf

7. Regiony Rossii. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli. 2022: Stat. sb. [Regions of Russia. Socio-economic Indicators. 2022: Statistical Book]. Moscow, Rosstat, 2022, 1122 p., available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Region_Pokaz_2022.pdf

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.5

permanent link >>>