Path to a Dream and a Lot of Music

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.110-111

The novel “Reconstruction” by journalist and musician Boris Igorevich Lifanovsky plunges into realit y, which, according to the author, “should remain in the past.”

Value Foundations of the Methodology for Compatibility of Society Paradigms

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.102-109

The purpose of the study is to form the value foundations of the methodology for compatibility of the society paradigms and society subsystems. Mutually complementary types of value theories and dual understanding of values are analyzed. The article explores the common values of the society paradigms, including sustainable development, social justice; inclusiveness, equality and human rights protection. Necessary composition of aspects of the value foundations for methodology of compatibility of society paradigms is formed and a structural scheme of paradigms compatibility of society spheres is compiled.

References: 

1. Morozov V.A. Metodologiya sovmestimosti paradigm obshchestva: filosofsko-psikhologicheskie i sistemotekhnicheskie osnovaniya [Methodology of compatibility for society paradigms: philosophical-psychological and system-technical foundations]. Menedzhment i biznes-administrirovanie. Moscow, ID “Ekonomicheskaya gazeta”, 2024, no 2, pp. 209–217.

2. D’yui Dzh. Obshchestvo i ego problem [Society and its problems]. Per. s angl. I.I. Myurberg, A.B. Tolstova, E.N. Kosilovoy. Moscow, Ideya-Press, 2002, 160 p.

3. Sheler M. Resentiment v strukture moraley [Resentment in the morals structure]. Per. s nem. A.N. Malinkina. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, 1999, 282 p.

4. Vindel’band V. Istoriya filosofii [History of philosophy]. Per. s nem. A.I. Vvedenskogo. Moscow, KANON-press, 1998, 548 p.

5. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie: struktura, istoricheskaya evolyutsiya [Theoretical knowledge: structure, historical evolution]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, 2000, 743 p.

6. Salas S.D. Moral’ XXI veka [Morality of the 21st century]. Moscow, Kodeks, 2013, 483 p.

7. Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy: ocherki o germenevtike [Conflict of Interpretations: Essays on Hermeneutics]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt, 2008, 695 p.

8. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Tsennosti kul’tury i razvitie obshchestva [Cultural values and development of societ y]. Moscow, ID GVShE, 2007, 528 p.

9. Anopchenko T.Yu., Savon D.Yu. Ustoychivoe razvitie: opyt, problemy, perspektivy [Sustainable development: experience, challenges, prospects]. Moscow, Institut ustoychivogo razvitiya Obshchestvennoy palaty Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Tsentr ekologicheskoy politiki Rossii, 2011, p. 120.

10. Morozov V.A. Dukhovnaya ekonomika i sovmestimost’ obshchestva. Teoriya sovmestimosti [Spiritual economy and compatibility of society. Compatibility theory]. Moscow, Dashkov i K°, 2021, 576 p.

Mental Sovereignty

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.96-101

Over the past three centuries, economic liberalism has emerged as a global cultural norm that permeates international institutions and business practices. Global turbulence has coincided with degradation of the idea of liberalism; corporate leaders feel the need for change, but don’t associate the transformation goals with exhaustion of the liberal model.

References:

1. Vtulkina N., Firsov A. Khrupkaya, trevozhnaya, nelineynaya, nepostizhimaya [Fragile, Disturbing, Non-linear, Incomprehensible]. Forbes, 2022, 5 sentyabrya, available at: https://www.forbes.ru/forbeslife/476185-vse-v-bani-pocemu-tak-nazyvaetsa-novaa-trevoznaa-epoha-i-kak-v-nej-zit

2. Bashnin A.V., Ozols O.K. Kto upravlyaet IT krupnykh industrial’nykh kompaniy? [Who Manages the IT of Large Industrial Companies?]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2024, no 3(195), pp. 60–67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-3.195.2024.60-67

3. Belousov L.V. Biologicheskiy morfogenez [Biological Morphogenesis]. Moscow, URSS, 2023, 256 p.

4. Wonga M.L., Cleland C.E., Arend D.J., Bartlettd S., Cleaves H.J., Demarestc H., Prabhua A., Lunineg J.I., Hazen R.M. On the roles of function and selection in evolving systems. PNAS, 2023, vol. 120, no 43, e2310223120.

5. Sharma A., Czégel D., Lachmann M., Kempes C.P., Walker S.I., Cronin L. Assembly theory explains and quantifies selection and evolution. Nature, vol. 622, October 12, 2023.

6. Budanov V.G. Metodologiya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoy nauke i v obrazovanii [Synergetics Methodology in Post-nonclassical Science and Education]. Moscow, LKI, 2009, 240 p.

Knowledge Management in the Context of Spiral Dynamics

DOI: 10.33917/es-6.198.2024.104-111

Nowadays, the «knowledge management» concept is often used, since today an employee is, first of all, an intellectual worker. However, an allowance is rarely made for the organizational environment in which managers and executives manage

knowledge and due to which this management can be modified. The purpose of the present work is to explain the «knowledge management» term from the point of view of the spiral dynamics concept. The results of the analysis have revealed that interpretation of the «knowledge management» concept becomes more complicated as the level of spiral dynamics increases, and it also begins to acquire features of its previous levels. These assumptions are intended to help managers and executives adapt their skills in intellectual worker management based on the level of spiral dynamics at which their organization is.

References:

1. Sukharev O.S. Tekhnologicheskiy suverenitet Rossii: formirovanie na baze razvitiya sektora “ekonomika znaniy” [Technological Sovereignty of Russia: Formation based on the Development of the “Knowledge Economy” Sector]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2024, no 1, pp. 47–64, DOI: https://doi.org/DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2024_1_47_64

2. Gurtskoy L.D., Zudin A.B., Vvedenskiy A.I. Upravlenie zdorov’em sotrudnikov v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii [Employee Health Management in the Context of Digitalization]. Problemy sotsial’noy gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny, 2022, vol. 30, no 6, pp. 1313–1317, DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2022-30-6-1313-1317

3. Mintsberg G. 2004. Struktura v kulake: sozdanie effektivnoy organizatsii [Structure in a Fist: Creating an Effective Organization]. Per. s angl. pod red. Yu.N. Kapturevskogo. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2004, 512 p.

4. SDi Foundation [Website]. Spiral Dynamics Foundation, 2024, available at: https://sdifoundation.com

5. Bek D., Larsen T., Solonin S., Vildzhoen R. Spiral’naya dinamika na praktike. Model’ razvitiya lichnosti, organizatsii i chelovechestva [Spiral Dynamics in Practice: A Model of Personal, Organizational and Human Development]. Moscow, Al’pina Pablisher, 2018.

6. Butters Albion M. A brief history of Spiral Dynamics. Approaching Religion, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 67–78.

7. Graves C.W. With comments by E.C. World Future Society. Human Nature Prepares for a Momentous Leap. The Futurist, 1974, pp. 72–87.

8. Bek D., Kovan K. Spiral’naya dinamika. Upravlyaya tsennostyami, liderstvom i izmeneniya v XXI veke [Spiral Dynamics: Managing Values, Leadership, and Change in the 21st Century]. BestBusinessBooks. Open World Publishing House, 2010, 424 p.

9. Lalu F. Otkryvaya organizatsii budushchego [Discovering the Organizations of the Future]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2016.

10. Kleyner G.B. Spiral’naya dinamika, sistemnye tsikly i novye organizatsionnye modeli: perlamutrovye predpriyatiya [Spiral Dynamics, Systemic Cycles and New Organizational Models: Pearlescent Enterprises]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta, 2020, vol. 18, no 4, pp. 471–496, available at: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2020.401

Cooperative Economy — Back to the Future

DOI: 10.33917/es-5.197.2024.96-105

The authors have examined historical, social and economic foundations of the previously presented model of a cooperative economy, presented arguments in favour of a cooperative economy as civilizationally organic economic model for Russia.

References:

1. Pereslegin S.B. Tsivilizatsii v lyudyakh i kodakh [Civilizations in People and Codes]. Izborskiy klub, 2021, 17 fevralya, available at: https://izborsk-club.ru/20672

2. Toshchenko Zh.T. Prekariat. Ot protoklassa k novomu klassu [Precariat: From Protoclass to New Class]. Institut sotsiologii FNISTs RAN, RGGU, Moscow, Nauka, 2018, 346 p.

3. Stending G. Prekariat: novyy opasnyy klass [The Precariat: A New Dangerous Class]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2011.

4. Galushka A.S., Niyazmetov A.K., Okulov M.O. Kristall rosta. K russkomu ekonomicheskomu chudu [Crystal of Growth. Towards the Russian Economic Miracle]. Moscow, 2021.

5. Spitsyn E.Yu. Khrushchevskaya slyakot’. Sovetskaya derzhava v 1953–1964 gody [Khrushchev’s Slush. The Soviet State in 1953-1964]. Kontseptual, 2019.

6. Rezolyutsiya XX s”ezda KPSS. 24 fevralya 1956 g. Po otchetnomu dokladu TsK KPSS [Resolution of the 20th Congress of the CPSU. February 24, 1956. According to the Report of the Central Committee of the CPSU]. Elektronnaya biblioteka istoricheskikh dokumentov, available at: https://docs.historyrussia.org/ru/nodes/355234- rezolyutsiya-xx-sezda-kpss-24-fevralya-1956-g-po-otchetnomu-dokladu-tsentralnogo-komiteta-kpss-izvlechenie

7. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Ofitsial’nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii. St. 7, p. 1, available at: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102027595

8. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Konsul’tant. St. 1, available at: https://www.consultant.ru/ document/cons_doc_LAW_5142/

9. Marks K. Kapital [Capital]. Internet archive, vol. 3, part 1, available at: https://archive.org/details/1951-iiiKarl_Marx_1951_Kapital_Tom_3

10. Galimova L.N. Osobennosti mentaliteta kuptsa-staroobryadtsa [Peculiarities of the Mentality of the Old Believer Merchant]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2011, no 3(19), pp. 26–33.

11. Uest Dzh.L. Staroobryadtsy i predprinimatel’skaya kul’tura v tsarskoy Rossii: Istoricheskie khroniki [Old Believers and Entrepreneurial Culture in Tsarist Russia: Historical Chronicles]. Cyberleninka, available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/staroobryadtsy-i-predprinimatelskaya-kultura-vtsarskoy-rossii

2024 — Year of the Family. New Measures to Support the Birth Rate in Russia

DOI: 10.33917/es-4.196.2024.114-123

Recently Russia has been actively searching for a way out of the demographic crisis. A timely response to internal demographic problems became the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin, according to which 2024 has been declared the Year of the Family. Focus on popularizing family values shows that the problem is becoming more and more pertinent, and no effective solutions have been found to date.

Demographic problem in general is widely discussed in Russia, attempts are made to reverse the negative trend with the help of various economic measures. However, any significant progress hasn’t yet been achieved. In this regard, new views and approaches to solving this problem are extremely in demand.

References:

1. Goncharova N.P., Eremin A.A., Tarasova E.V. K voprosu o metodike otsenki rezul’tativnosti demograficheskoy politiki. Demograficheskiy potentsial stran EAES: VIII Ural’skiy demograficheskiy forum [On the Methodology for Assessing the Effectiveness of Demographic Policy: Demographic Potential of the EAEU Countries: VIII Ural Demographic Forum]. Vol. II. Ekaterinburg, Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN, 2017, pp. 77–81.

2. Pasport natsional’nogo proekta “Demografiya” (utv. prezidiumom Soveta pri Prezidente RF po strategicheskomu razvitiyu i natsional’nym proektam, protokol ot 24 dekabrya 2018 g. N 16) [Passport of the National Project “Demography” (Approved by the Presidium of the Council under the President of the Russian Federation for Strategic Development and National Projects, Protocol of December 24, 2018 No. 16)], available at: http://static.government.ru/media/ files/Z4OMjDgCaeohKWaA0psu6lCekd3hwx2m.pdf

3. Demografiya [Demography]. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki, available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781

4. Federal’nyy zakon ot 19 maya 1995 g. N 81-FZ “O gosudarstvennykh posobiyakh grazhdanam, imeyushchim detey” (v red. Federal’nykh zakonov ot 24 noyabrya 1995 g. N 184-FZ, ot 18 iyunya 1996 g. N 76-FZ, ot 24 noyabrya 1996 g. N 130-FZ, ot 30 dekabrya 1996 g. N 162-FZ, ot 21 iyulya 1998 g. N 117-FZ, ot 29 iyulya 1998 g. N 134-FZ, ot 17 iyulya 1999 g. N 171-FZ, ot 10 iyulya 2000 g. N 93-FZ, ot 7 avgusta 2000 g. N 122-FZ, ot 30 maya 2001 g. N 66-FZ, ot 30 maya 2001 g. N 67-FZ, ot 28 dekabrya 2001 g. N 181-FZ, ot 25 iyulya 2002 g. N 116-FZ, ot 22 avgusta 2004 g. N 122-FZ, ot 29 dekabrya 2004 g. N 206-FZ) [Federal Law of May 19, 1995 No. 81-FZ «On State Benefits to Citizens with Children» (as amended by Federal Laws of November 24, 1995 No. 184-FZ, June 18, 1996 No. 76-FZ, November 24, 1996 No. 130-FZ, December 30, 1996 No. 162-FZ, July 21, 1998 No. 117-FZ, July 29, 1998 No. 134-FZ, July 17, 1999 No. 171-FZ, July 10, 2000 No. 93-FZ, August 7, 2000 No. 122-FZ of May 30, 2001 No. 66-FZ of May 30, 2001 No. 67-FZ of December 28, 2001 No. 181-FZ of July 25, 2002 No. 116- FZ of August 22, 2004 No. 122-FZ of December 29, 2004 No. 206-FZ)]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Ministerstva truda i sotsial’noy zashchity RF, available at: https://mintrud. gov.ru/docs/laws/77

On the Way to the Harmosphere

DOI: 10.33917/es-4.196.2024.108-113

The article dwells on the concept of harmosphere — the sphere of harmony of mind and feeling, man and nature, natural and human sciences. The noosphere arose with the beginning of the “industrial revolution”, when the progress of mankind as a whole came to be determined by reason. According to V.I. Vernadsky, man becomes “the largest geological force.” Modernity corresponds to the end of the noospheric stage of development and the beginning of the harmosphere formation. The “end” of the noosphere correlates with the emergence and legalization of nuclear missile weapons capable of destroying civilization.

References:

1. Golubev V.S. Osnovy garmonologii [Basics of Harmonology]. Moscow, Lenand, 2018.

2. Golubev V.S. Priroda — chelovek — obshchestvo: razvitie i garmoniya [Nature — Man — Society: Development and Harmony]. Moscow, Lenand, 2016.

3. Golubev V.S. Garmoniya spaset mir [Harmony will Save the World]. Moscow, Lenand, 2017.

4. Golubev V.S. Ocherki ekosotsiogumanizma [Essays on Ecosociohumanism]. Moscow, Lenand, 2021.

5. Panov A.D. Singulyarnaya tochka istorii [Singular Point of History] Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2015, no 1.

Anthropic Control of Causal Processes to “Requantize Reality”

DOI: 10.33917/es-4.196.2024.98-107

The role of a man in the universal evolutionary process is underestimated. With the advent of a man, the Multiverse begins to realize itself, cognize and transform itself. Creation of a socially significant reality throughout history is manifested by the anthropic principle, which makes the quantum properties of objects dependent on a person endowed with intelligence.

In the universal evolution formation of mass-kinetic structures and processes has completed and the “requantization of reality” is taking place — transition to information-semantic forms of being and consciousness. A social state, capable of concentrating the necessary resources for a quantum leap into the future, can become an instrument of planned transition. To interact with the Multiverse, it is necessary to apply closing technologies both in technical and humanitarian fields of knowledge.

References:

1. Panov A.D. Universal’naya evolyutsiya i problema poiska vnezemnogo razuma (SETI) [Artificial Intelligence in HR: Four Pros and Four Cons]. Moscow, Izd-vo LKI, 2008. 208 p. (Sinergetika v gumanitarnykh naukakh.)

2. Sudakov K.V. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]. Moscow, GU NII normal’noy fiziologii im. P.K. Anokhina RAMN, 2007, vol. 1 Razvitie teorii funktsional’nykh sistem. Moscow, 2007, pp. 174–218, 311–337.

3. Sudakov K.V., Kuzichev I.A., Nikolaev A.B. Shchelkanov V.I. Evolyutsiya terminologii i skhem funktsional’nykh sistem v nauchnoy shkole P.K. Anokhina [The Evolution of Terminology and Diagrams of Functional Systems in the Scientific School of P.K. Anokhina]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 80.

4. Sudakov K.V. Informatsionnyy emotsional’nyy rezonans [Informational Emotional Resonance]. Moscow, RITs MGGU im. M.A. Sholokhova, 2008, p. 38.

5. Anokhin P.K. Biologiya i neyrofiziologiya uslovnogo refleksa [Biology and Neurophysiology of the Conditioned Reflex]. Moscow, Meditsina, 1968.

6. Sukharev A.V. Opyt paradigmal’nogo obobshcheniya filosofsko-religioznykh i misticheskikh osnovaniy gumanitarnogo i estestvenno-nauchnogo podkhodov v psikhologicheskoy nauke [Experience of Paradigmatic Generalization of Philosophical, Religious and Mystical Foundations of Humanitarian and Natural Science Approaches in Psychological Science]. Uchenye zapiski Instituta psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2022, vol. 2, no 4, pp. 4–17.

7. Istoriya Temnogo mira [History of the Dark World]. Avt.-sost. A. Lindin. Rostov n/D, Feniks, Saint Petersburg, Izd-vo “Severo-Zapad”, 2007, 832 p.

8. Belavin V.A, Kurdyumov S.P. Rezhimy s obostreniem i zakony koevolyutsii slozhnykh sistem [Aggravation Regimes and Laws of Coevolution of Complex Systems]. Sayt S.P. Kurdyumova “Sinergetika”, available at: http:// spkurdyumov.ru/evolutionism/zakony-koevolyucii-slozhnyxsistem/

9. Kara-Murza S.G., Piskunov D.I. Nauka i ideologiya [Science and Ideology]. Moscow, Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1991.

10. Pereslegin S.B., Korolev A.A., Shilov S.Yu. Kognitivnye predely nauchnogo myshleniya [Cognitive Limits of Scientific Thinking]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2019, no 2, pp. 44–55.

Methodology for Compatibility of the State and Development of Society Paradigms

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.108-115

The purpose of the study is to develop the bases of a methodology for compatibility of paradigms of society and its subsystems based on the compatibility of human needs and social values. The growing paradigmatic field of society is examined. The author studies expanded composition of the society subsystems based on the spheres of its life activity. He also defines and presents the compatibility of the society subsystems and the subsystems of an organization as a “unit” of society. A list of the main paradigms in the hierarchy of society subsystems is compiled. The role and significance of the methodology fundamentals for compatibility of the society paradigms are substantiated.

References:

1. Spenser G. Sotsial’naya statika [Social Statics]. Moscow, Yurayt, 2023, 424 p.

2. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Vol. 2. Samosoznanie evropeyskoy kul’tury XX veka [The Decline of Europe. Vol. 2. Self-awareness of the European Culture of the Twentieth Century]. Moscow, IPL, 1991.

3. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow, AST, 2020, 320 p.

4. Toynbi A. Issledovanie istorii. Vozniknovenie, rost i raspad tsivilizatsiy [A Study of History. The Emergence, Growth and Disintegration of Civilizations]. Moscow, AST: AST MOSKVA, 2009.

5. Bondarenko O.Ya. Sbornik dokladov po teorii i filosofii edinogo polya (Podgot. na osnove serii knig “Filosofiya Edinstva”) [Collection of Reports on the Theory and Philosophy of the Unified Field. (Podgot. based on the Book Series “Philosophy of Unit y”)]. Bishkek, 2000.

6. Deyl S. Tonkoe telo. Polnaya entsiklopediya bioenergeticheskoy meditsiny [The Thin Body. The Complete Encyclopedia of Bioenergetic Medicine]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2013.

7. Maslou A. Motivatsiya i lichnost’ [Motivation and Personalit y]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Piter, 2013, 351 p.

8. Berezina T.N. Rezervnye vozmozhnosti cheloveka [Human Reserve Capabilitie]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2000.

9. Morozov V.A. Sovmestimost’ sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem. Osnovy teorii sovmestimosti [Compatibility of Socio-economic Systems. Fundamentals of the Theory of Compatibility]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 2013.

10. Panov P.V. Instituty, identichnosti, praktiki: teoreticheskaya model’ politicheskogo poryadka [Institutions, Identities, Practices: a Theoretical Model of the Political Order]. Moscow, Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2011, 230 p.

11. Kleyner G.B. Strategiya predpriyatiya [Enterprise Strategy]. Moscow, Delo, 2008.

12. Morozov V.A. Obshchestvo i ekonomika vzaimodeystviya [Society and Economics of Interaction]. Monografiya. Vol. 2. Moscow, Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2017.

13. Morozov V.A. Dukhovnaya ekonomika i sovmestimost’ obshchestva. Teoriya sovmestimosti [Spiritual Economy and Compatibility of Society. Compatibility Theory]. Moscow, Izdatel’sko-torgovaya korporatsiya “Dashkov i K°”, 2021, DOI: 10.29030/978-5-394-04571-4-2021-5-577.

14. Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. N.Y., Oxford Universit y Press, 1996.