DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.88-95

The state and municipal property management system is a set of agreed methods and means of targeted influence on the subjects of management process in order to achieve specified goals. The principle of maximizing the income received cannot be used as the basis for assessing the management of state and municipal proper ty objects due to the public nature of this category. In addition to the general principles of managing state and municipal proper ty inherent in the existing mixed economy, it is also necessary to take into account specific ones that meet the requirements of the transition period.

These include: compliance of the content and methods of management with the nature of reforms and, first and foremost, with ensuring progressive institutional shifts in the economy; focus of management on overcoming the systemic crisis of the economy and implementing its restructuring; compliance of organizational elements of management with the tasks of implementing industrial, investment, innovation and other policy areas.

References:

1. Rozhkov E.V. Ispol’zovanie zemli v granitsakh munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya kak polozhitel’nyy opyt upravleniya krupnym gorodom [Use of Land within the Boundaries of a Municipality as a Positive Experience in Managing a Large City]. Vestnik soveta molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Chelyabinskoy oblasti, 2022, vol. 1, no 1(36), pp. 69–75.

2. Bagaeva L.E., Kondratenko Z.K. Stanovlenie i reformirovanie zakonodatel’stva o privatizatsii munitsipal’nogo imushchestva [Formation and Reform of Legislation on the Privatization of Municipal Property]. Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoricheskie nauki. Yuridicheskie nauki, 2019, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 166–172, DOI: 10.30914/2411-3522-20195-2-166-172.

3. Akhmatova A.M., Lushinkova T.Yu. Bol’shaya privatizatsiya: tseli, zadachi, osobennosti realizatsii v rossiyskoy ekonomike [Large-scale Privatization: Goals, Objectives, Implementation Features in the Russian Economy]. Obshchestvo, ekonomika, upravlenie, 2018, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 10–16.

4. Mal’ginov G.N., Radygin A.D. Pervye itogi privatizatsionnoy programmy 2017–2019 gg. i osnovnye voprosy upravleniya gosudarstvennym imushchestvom [The First Results of the Privatization Program 2017–2019 and the Main Issues of State Property Management]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii, 2018, vol. 25, no 6, Iyun’ — iyul’, pp. 42–55.

5. Grigor’ev L.M., Kurdin A.A. Nereshennyy vopros legitimnosti chastnoy sobstvennosti v Rossii [The Unresolved Question of the Legitimacy of Private Property in Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2016, no 1, pp. 36–62.

6. Gengut Yu.L. Metodologiya statisticheskogo issledovaniya protsessov privatizatsii gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo imushchestva na territorii Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Methodology of Statistical Research of Privatization Processes of State and Municipal Property on the Territory of the Russian Federation]. Regional’noe razvitie: elektronnyy nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal, 2014, no 2, pp. 112–119.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.80-87

The article dwells on the issues of implementing the strategy of sustainable innovative development of Russian regions as a basis for creating competitive advantages of territories and improving the quality of the population life. The work, in relation to the regions of Russia bordering China, describes the concept of “smart specialization” — a strategy for identifying priority areas for the regions development and enhancing specific types of economic activity, which involves exploiting the potential of their innovative growth, choosing a unique path with a focus on future development. The authors focus on the industry specialization of regions as a basis for determining directions of «smart specialization». As a result of the study, the authors propose the models of crossborder cooperation for the regions of Russia and China based on the «smart specialization» of the above regions.

References:

1. Voronov A.S. Upravlenie ustoychivym innovatsionnym razvitiem regional’nykh sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem: Monografiya [Management of Sustainable Innovative Development of Regional Socio-Economic Systems]. Monograph. Moscow, YuNITI-DANA, 2022, 287 p.

2. Aver’yanov M.A., Evtushenko S.N., Zhivaykin A.L., Kochetova E.Yu. Strategicheskoe planirovanie v usloviyakh vyzovov tsifrovoy transformatsii [Strategic Planning in the Face of Digital Transformation Challenges]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2024, no 1, pp. 54–61, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-1.193.2024.54-61

3. Orlova L.N. Osnovnye printsipy i podkhody k upravleniyu ustoychivym innovatsionnym razvitiem ekonomicheskikh system [Basic Principles and Approaches to Managing Sustainable Innovative Development of Economic Systems]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2016, no 3, pp. 3–9.

4. Alekseev A.V. Vyyavlenie klyuchevykh spetsializatsiy regionov i klasternykh struktur v usloviyakh perekhoda k kontseptsii “umnoy spetsializatsii” (na primere Baykal’skogo makroregiona) [Identification of Key Specializations of Regions and Cluster Structures in the Context of the Transition to the Concept of “Smart Specialization” (using the Example of the Baikal Macroregion)]. Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 2021, no 38(6), pp. 34–39.

5. Tagirov K.T., Glushchenko A.V., Dovgan’ E.A. Strategiya “umnoy spetsializatsii” regionov kak faktor innovatsionnogo razvitiya [The Strategy of “Smart Specialization” of Regions as a Factor of Innovative Development]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski, 2023, no 1, pp. 152–156.

6. Kroll H. Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice — Leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 2015, no 23(10), pp. 2079–2098, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036

7. Sotarauta M. Smart specialization and place leadership: Dreaming about shared visions, falling into policy traps? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2018, no 5(1), pp. 190–203, DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2018.1480902

DOI: 10.33917/es-6.198.2024.90-97

A special feature of the use of expert networks in public administration is the need to involve collective intelligence technologies based on a competence-based approach. The article proposes a scheme for organizing such use of expert communities with the help of national, sectoral and departmental competency frameworks. Introduction of expert networks in public administration can become a driver for their implementation in all spheres of the economy and public life of Russia, a tool for involving citizens in self-government.

References:

1. The Yankee Group. Knowledge Management. People and the Process. Boston, 1997, 89 p.

2. Friberg M. Expert network market size. Inex One, 2024, available at: https://inex.one/blog/expert-network-market-size

3. Slavin B. Sovremennye ekspertnye seti [Modern Expert Networks]. Otkrytye sistemy, 2014, no 7, pp. 30–33.

4. Noveck B.S. Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington DC, Brookings Institution Press, 2009, 224 p.

5. Dutton W.H. Networking Distributed Public Expertise: Strategies for Citizen Sourcing Advice to Government. Washington D.C., One of a Series of Occasional Papers in Science and Technology Policy, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Institute for Defense Analyses, 2010. 40 p.

6. EonD top talent accross policy lifecycle. EonD, available at: https://eond.eu/for-clients/government/

7. The OECD Network of Behavioural Insights Experts in Government. The OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation, 2024, available at: https://oecd-opsi.org/bi-network/

8. Australian Government Consulting. AGC, available at: https://agc.gov.au/

9. Perechen’ ekspertnykh sovetov pri FAS Rossii [List of Expert Councils under the FAS Russia]. FAS Rossii, available at: https://fas.gov.ru/pages/vazhnayainformacziya/otkryitoe-vedomstvo/ekspertnye_sovety

10. Federal’nyy reestr ekspertov nauchno-tekhnicheskoy sfery [Federal Register of Experts in the Scientific and Technical Sphere]. FGBNU NII RINKTsE, available at: https://reestr.extech.ru/experty/index.php

11. Slavin B.B. Tekhnologii kollektivnogo intellekta [Collective Intelligence Technologies]. Problemy upravleniya, 2016, no 5, pp. 2–9.

12. Boucher S., Hallin C.A., Paulson L., editors. The Routledge Handbook of Collective Intelligence for Democracy and Governance. Abingdon, Taylor & Francis Group, 2023, 522 p.

13. Lepskiy V.E. Metodologicheskiy i filosofskiy analiz razvitiya problematiki upravleniya [Methodological and Philosophical Analysis of the Development of Management Issues]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2019, 340 p.

14. Sungurov A. Ekcpertnye soobshchestva i vlast’ [Expert Communities and Authorities]. Moscow, Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2020, 231 p.

15. Avdeeva Z.K., Baryshnikov P.Yu., Slavin B.B. Strategicheskoe tselepolaganie v situatsionnykh tsentrakh razvitiya [Strategic Goal Setting in Situational Development Centers]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2018, 320 p.

DOI: 10.33917/es-6.198.2024.84-89

The article dwells on the change in the market index of the “Economic Strategies” (MIES) for the first nine months of 2024.

Contribution of supply and demand indicators to the MIES is assessed. Industrial production is analyzed.

References:

1. Informatsiya o XIII s”ezde Federatsii nezavisimykh profsoyuzov Rossii ot 29 oktyabrya 2024 g. [Information about the XIII Congress of the Federation of Independent Trade Unions of Russia dated October 29, 2024]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Prezidenta RF, available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75434

2. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie Rossii v yanvare — sentyabre 2024 goda [Socio-economic Situation in Russia in January — September 2024]. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki, available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/osn-09-2024.pdf

3. Informatsiya o strategicheskoy sessii Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o formirovanii edinogo plana po dostizheniyu natsional’nykh tseley razvitiya na period do 2030 goda i na perspektivu do 2036 goda ot 12 noyabrya 2024 g. [Information on the Strategic Session of the Government of the Russian Federation on the Formation of a Unified Plan for Achieving National Development Goals for the Period up to 2030 and for the Future up to 2036 dated November 12, 2024]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Pravitelstva RF, available at: http://government.ru/news/53282/

4. Prognoz sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na 2025 god i na planovyy period 2026 i 2027 godov [Forecast of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation for 2025 and for the Planning Period of 2026 and 2027], available at: file:///C:/Users/%D0%BF%D0%BA/Desktop/prognoz_socialno_ekonomicheskogo_razvitiya_rf_2025-2027.pdf

5. Frenkel’ A.A., Tikhomirov B.I., Surkov A.A. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii v I kvartale 2024 g. — ekonomicheskiy rost uskoryaetsya [Socioeconomic Development of Russia in the First Quarter of 2024 — Economic Growth is Accelerating]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2024, no 3(195), pp. 120–125, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-2.195.2024.120-125

6. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 7 maya 2024 g. “O natsional’nykh tselyakh razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2030 goda i na perspektivu do 2036 goda” [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2024 “On the national development goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 and for the perspective up to 2036”]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Prezidenta RF, available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/73986

DOI: 10.33917/es-6.198.2024.72-83

The author presents conceptual restructuring of the real essence of reforming economic and investment activities in late 1991 — early 1992, associated with the introduction of international accounting and reporting standards. Особое и преимущественно разрушительное влияние имело изменение правил реновации основных средств. Changing the rules for renovation of fixed assets had a particular and predominantly destructive impact. Actual destruction of the “depreciation fund” balance sheet in “liberalized” accounting became a trigger for undermining the factors of reproducing industrial potential, reducing the profits of enterprises and the revenues of the consolidated state budget.

References:

1. Ageev A.I., Galushkina M.V., Kopkova E.S., Smirnova V.A., Shtukel’berger K. Integrirovannaya otchetnost’: vyzov menedzhmentu [Integrated Reporting: A Management Challenge]. Moscow, Institut ekonomicheskikh strategiy, Natsional’nyy tsentr nauchno-tekhnicheskoy informatsii, 2017, 212 p.

2. Mervin King: “My dolzhny povernut’ za ugol i vyyti na prospekt stabil’nogo kapitalizma” [Mervyn King: “We Need to Turn the Corner and Walk Out at the Avenue of Stable Capitalism”]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2014, no 2, pp. 6–13.

3. Ageev A.I., Ovchinnikov V.V. Sistemnye konstruktsii global’nogo rynka nefti i nefteproduktov [System Designs of the Global Oil and Oil Products Market]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2016, no 4, pp. 122–133.

4. Ovchinnikov V.V. Regulirovanie raznykh vidov ekonomicheskoy deyatel’nosti v epokhu shestoy tekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii [Regulation of Various

Economic Activities in the Sixth Technological Revolution Era]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2014, no 10, pp. 112–123.

5. Ageev A.I., Met’yuz R., Bol’shakov Z.A. Giperkonkurentsiya [Hypercompetition]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2002, no 4, pp. 50–53.

6. Efremov I.A., Igumnov Yu.S. Bukhgalterskiy uchet v ugol’noy promyshlennosti [Accounting in the Coal Industry]. Moscow, Nedra, 1974, 296 p.

7. Sokolov Ya.V., Sokolov V.Ya. Istoriya bukhgalterskogo ucheta [History of Accounting]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 2004, 272 p.

8. Fedorovich V.A., Muravnik V.B., Bochkarev O.I. SShA: voennaya ekonomika (organizatsiya i upravlenie) [USA: War Economy (Organization and Management)]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2013, 616 p.

9. Sokolov Ya.V. Osnovy teorii bukhgalterskogo ucheta [Fundamentals of Accounting Theory]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 2000, 496 p.

10. Radina V.A., Yakutin Yu.V. Novye finansovye tekhnologii sistemy upravleniya ekonomicheskoy deyatel’nost’yu [New Financial Technologies for Economic Activity Management Systems]. Finansovaya zhizn’, 2024, no 2, pp. 108–146.

11. Strel’tsov A.V., Yakovlev G.I. Soderzhatel’naya otsenka roli amortizatsii kak istochnika investitsiy dlya modernizatsii predpriyatiy [Substantial Assessment of the Role of Depreciation as an Investment Source for the Enterprises Modernization]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2021, no 3, pp. 53–60.

DOI: 10.33917/es-6.198.2024.64-71

Special investment contracts are bilaterally binding agreements that can be amended or terminated at the initiative of either party. Thus, about 10% of special investment contracts concluded with the par ticipation of the Russian Federation under the SPIC 1.0 and SPIC 2.0 models from 2017 to September 2024 were cancelled or terminated. Provisions of more than 25% of concluded special investment contracts were changed at the initiative of the private par ty to the contract, some of them were modified several times. The ar ticle examines the issues of parties’ liability to a special investment contract for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of contractual obligations, analyzes dynamics of changes and terminations of concluded SPICs and assesses such phenomena from the point of view of their impact on achieving the goals of public legal entities.

References:

1. Akopyan O.A. Transformatsiya regulyatornoy modeli spetsial’nogo investitsionnogo kontrakta (SPIK) [The Transformation of the Regulatory Model of a Special Investment Contract (SPIC)]. Finansovoe pravo, 2020, no 6, pp. 28–33, DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1220-2020-6-28-33

2. Yevstafyeva Yu.V. Reformirovanie instrumenta spetsial’nogo investitsionnogo kontrakta [Reforming an Instrument of Special Investment Contract]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2020, no 1(167), pp. 64–71, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-1.167.2020.64-71

3. Yevstafyeva Yu.V. Spetsial’nye investitsionnye kontrakty novogo pokoleniya — SPIK 2.0: osobennosti ispol’zovaniya i perspektivy [Special Investment Contracts of New Edition — SPIC 2.0: Features of Use and Perspectives]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyy vestnik, 2023, no 99, pp. 49–61, DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2023-99-49-61

4. Sokolov A.B. Spetsial’nyy investitsionnyy kontrakt kak instrument podderzhki tekhnologicheskoy modernizatsii ekonomiki Rossii [Special Investment Contract as a Tool to Support Technological Modernization of the Russian Economy]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2022, no 3, pp. 182–194, DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2022_3_182_194

5. Federal’nyy zakon ot 14 marta 2022 g. N 57-FZ “O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat’yu 2 Federal’nogo zakona ‘O vnesenii izmeneniy v Federal’nyy zakon ‘O promyshlennoy politike v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» v chasti regulirovaniya spetsial’nykh investitsionnykh kontraktov” [Federal Law of 14 March 2022 No. 57-FZ “On Making Amendments in Federal Law ‘On Industrial Policy in the Russian Federation’ in the Regulation of Special Investment Contracts”]. Konsul’tantPlyus, available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_411430/

6. Federal’nyy zakon ot 28 aprelya 2023 g. N 142-FZ “O vnesenii izmeneniya v stat’yu 2 Federal’nogo zakona ‘O vnesenii izmeneniy v Federal’nyy zakon ‘O promyshlennoy politike v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» v chasti regulirovaniya spetsial’nykh investitsionnykh kontraktov” [Federal Law of 28 April 2023 No. 142-FZ “On Making Amendments in Federal Law ‘On Industrial Policy in the Russian Federation’ in the Regulation of Special Investment Contracts”]. Ofitsial’nyy

DOI: 10.33917/es-6.198.2024.56-63

The author examines peculiarities of the influence of the “regulatory guillotine” mechanism, aimed at eliminating duplicate requirements and introducing reasonable standards. The article analyzes requirements for regulatory legal acts (using regional practices as an example), the purpose of which is to reduce the excessive administrative burden on a business entity.

References:

1. Mekhanizm “regulyatornoy gil’otiny” [Mechanism of the “Regulatory Guillotine”]. Ministerstvo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya RF, available at:
https://economy.gov.ru/material/directions/gosudarstvennoe_upravlenie/mehanizm_regulyatornoy_gilotiny/

2. Federal’nyy zakon ot 31 iyulya 2020 g. N 247-FZ “Ob obyazatel’nykh trebovaniyakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [Federal Law of July 31, 2020 No. 247-FZ “On Mandatory Requirements in the Russian Federation”]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF, 2020, no 31.

3. Federal’nyy zakon ot 11 iyunya 2021 g. N 170-FZ “O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel’nye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem Federal’nogo zakona ‘O gosudarstvennom kontrole (nadzore) i munitsipal’nom kontrole v Rossiyskoy Federatsii’” [Federal Law of June 11, 2021 No. 170-FZ “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Adoption of the Federal Law ‘On State Control (Supervision) and Municipal Control in the Russian Federation’”]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF, 2021, no 24 (Chast’ I).

4. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 19 aprelya 2021 g. N 14-P [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of April 19, 2021 No. 14-P]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF, 2021, no 17.

5. Tikhomirova L. A. Reforma kontrol’no-nadzornoy deyatel’nosti (“regulyatornaya gil’otina”) v sfere promyshlennoy bezopasnosti [Reform of Control and Supervisory Activities («Regulatory Guillotine») in the Field of Industrial Safety]. SPS “Konsul’tantPlyus”, 2021.

6. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Vostochno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 28 marta 2023 g. po delu N A33-2059/2022 [Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the East Siberian District dated March 28, 2023 in case No. A33-2059/2022]. Dostup iz SPS “Konsul’tant Plyus”.

7. Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 21 marta 2024 g. po delu N A40-139576/2023 [Resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated March 21, 2024 in case No. A40-139576/2023]. Dostup iz SPS “Konsul’tant Plyus”.

8. Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 16 sentyabrya 2020 g. N 305-ES20-4513 [Definition of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated September 16, 2020 No. 305-ES20-4513]. Dostup iz SPS “Konsul’tant Plyus”.

9. Federal’nyy zakon ot 6 dekabrya 2011 g. № 402-FZ “O Bukhgalterskom Uchete” [Federal Law No. 402-FZ of December 6, 2011 “On Accounting”]. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2011, no 278.

10. Nalogovyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast’ pervaya) ot 31 iyulya 1998 g. N 146-FZ [Tax Code of the Russian Federation (part one) of July 31, 1998 No. 146-FZ]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF, 1998, no 31.

DOI: 10.33917/es-6.198.2024.48-55

The article dwells on the policy of the Central Bank of Russia to suppress inflation and ensure stable economic growth. The purpose of the study is to identify the impact of the key interest rate on inflation and economic growth in Russia, to specify the negative consequences of its increase. Methodology is based on the theory of monetary policy and economic growth. The overall result obtained is that the current policy of increasing the k ey interest rate in Russia has a negative impact on economic development and is less successful in suppressing inflation than some economists and analysts expect. Moreover, it slows down economic growth, reproduces the growth of inequalit y over a long period, revealing a weakly positive effect in influencing inflation and a negative cumulative ef fect on the rate of economic growth. The approach from the perspective of “distributed control” and the cumulative ef fect, used in the article, makes it possible to reveal the joint dynamics of a number of relevant parameters that characterize and reflect the content and ef fectiveness of monetary policy in Russia. The proposal is that various policy instruments should be subordinated to the task of the real economy growth, supplying it with financial capital, against which the policy of a debt economy with a high interest rate works.

References:

1. Aganbegyan A.G. Tri glavnykh sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh vyzova, stoyashchikh pered Rossiey, i 15 otvetnykh shagov [Three Major Socio-economic Challenges Facing Russia and 15 Steps to Take in Response]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2023, no 1, pp. 6–15.

2. L’vov D.S. Ekonomika razvitiya [Development Economics]. Moscow, Ekzamen, 2022, 512 p.

3. Glazyev S.Yu. Kak denezhno-kreditnaya politika ugnetaet ekonomicheskiy rost v Rossii i Evraziyskom ekonomicheskom soyuze [How Monetary Policy Is Suppressing Economic Growth in Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2022, no 2, pp. 4–20.

4. Bank Rossii ne isklyuchil “bolee znachitel’nogo” povysheniya klyuchevoy stavki [The Bank of Russia did not Rule Out a “More Significant” Increase in the Key Rate]. Banki.ru, 2024, 29 avgusta, available at: https://www.banki.ru/news/lenta/?id=11006234

5. Analitiki TsB zayavili o predposylkakh dlya umen’sheniya peregreva v ekonomike [Central Bank Analysts have Announced Preconditions for Reducing Overheating in the Economy]. Interfax, 2024, 3 sentyabrya, available at: https://www.interfax.ru/business/979396

6. Tseny, inflyatsiya. Potrebitel’skie tseny [Prices, Inflation. Consumer Prices]. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki, available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/price

7. Klyuchevaya stavka i stavka refinansirovaniya [Key Rate and Refinancing Rate]. Garant, available at: https://base.garant.ru/10180094/

8. Denezhnaya massa M2 (natsional’noe opredelenie) [Money Supply M2 (National Definition)]. EMISS. Gosudarstvennaya statistika, available at: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/37697

DOI: 10.33917/es-5.197.2024.80-89

The article proposes approaches to implementing a system of monitoring pricing processes in the strategy of state regulation and to assessing the effectiveness of such monitoring system. The author synthesizes the key functional blocks of a unified system for monitoring pricing processes and, on their basis, develops appropriate approaches. Such approaches, containing information about some participants in the system, legal acts that will require changes, as well as quantitative and qualitative indicators for assessing performance, demonstrate the potential and scale of a unified system for monitoring pricing processes.

References:

1. Kabmin planiruet vklyuchit’ elektroenergetiku v servis skvoznogo ustanovleniya tarifov na baze “Gostekha” [The Cabinet of Ministers Plans to Include the Electric Power Industry in the End-to-end Tariff Setting Service Based on Gostekh]. Kodeks, 2024, 1 avgusta, available at: https://cntd.ru/news/read/kabminplaniruet-vkliucit-elektroenergetiku-v-servis-skvoznogo-ustanovleniia-tarifov-na-baze-gostexa

2. Kovalev A.V. Formirovanie mekhanizma regulirovaniya protsessov tsenoobrazovaniya v sovremennoy ekonomike [Formation of a Mechanism for Regulating Pricing in the Modern Economy]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2023, no 3, pp. 136–143, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-3.189.2023.136-143

3. Kovalev A.V., Orlova L.N., Domkin P.A., Sokolov S.M. Dialektika tseny i kontseptsiya sozdaniya edinoy sistemy monitoringa protsessov tsenoobrazovaniya v ekonomike: Monografiya [Dialectics of price and the Concept of Creating a Unified System for Monitoring Pricing Processes in the Economy: Monograph]. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2021, 189 p.

4. Afanas’ev M.P., Shash N.N. Instrumentariy otsenki effektivnosti byudzhetnykh program [Tools for Assessing the Effectiveness of Budget Programs]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya, 2013, no 3, pp. 48–69.

5. Gorshenin A.N., Gorshenina E.V. Klyuchevye pokazateli deyatel’nosti: ot strategii k real’no rabotayushchim pokazatelyam [Key Performance Indicators: from Strategy to Real-world Performance Indicators]. Ekonomicheskie issledovaniya, 2014, no 1.

6. Eremina G.A., Sobol’ O.V. Mesto izmereniya effektivnosti deyatel’nosti v sisteme upravleniya organizatsiey [The Place of Performance Measurement in the Organization’s Management System]. Upravlenie personalom i intellektual’nymi resursami v Rossii, 2017, vol. 6, no 2, pp. 29–33.

7. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. Organizatsiya, orientirovannaya na strategiyu. Kak v novoy biznes-srede preuspevayut organizatsii, primenyayushchie sbalansirovannuyu sistemu pokazateley [The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Organizations Are Succeeding in the New Business Environment]. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes, 2004, XVIII, 392 p. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Natsional’noy elektronnoy biblioteki, available at: https://rusneb.ru/ catalog/000199_000009_002428994/

8. Neely A., Mills J., Platts K., Richards H., Gregory M., Bourne M., Kennerley M. Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2000, vol. 20, no 10, pp. 1119–1145.

DOI: 10.33917/es-4.196.2024.90-97

The author addressed the topic of comparing the meanings of the terms “sustainability” and “resilience” due to the fact that both these terms are used in economic literature, and at the same time they are both translated into Russian as “sustainability”, which sometimes causes incorrect understanding of the meaning of certain texts. The article dwells on genesis and areas of application of these terms, it is noted that the frequency of applying the word “resilience” has increased significantly in recent years. At the same time, a generally accepted definition of this term has not yet been developed, at least in its economic application. The same is referred to the term “sustainability”. Disadvantages of each of the terms are listed and debate on the priority of one term over another is considered. The author briefly discussed the use of terms in the current context of the Russian economy. It is concluded that while in terms of “resilience” the domestic economy has demonstrated visible success, then in terms of “sustainability” prospects there are serious problems.

References:

1. Concise Oxford Dictionary. Tenth Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.

2. McAslan A., Director of the Torrens Resilience Institute. The Concept of Resilience: Understanding its Origins, Meaning and Utility. Australia, Adelaide, 2010, 14 March, available at: https://www.flinders.edu.au/content/dam/documents/research/torrens-resilience-institute/resilience-origins-and-utility.pdf

3. Moser, et al. (2019). Climatic Change, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0

4. ZOE, the Institute for Future-Fit Economies, available at: https://zoe-institut.de/en/home-2/

5. The Economic Resilience Index. Assessing the ability of EU economies to thrive in times of change, available at: https://zoe-institut.de/wp-content/ uploads/2023/09/Economic_Resilience_Index_Final-1.pdf

6. Rose A. Economic Resilience: Concepts and Measurement, available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/adam_rose_040321.pdf

7. Knuth K. The term “resilience” is everywhere — but what does it really mean, available at: https://ensia.com/articles/what-is-resilience/

8. Schmithüsen F.J. Three hundred years of applied sustainability in forestry, available at: https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/ handle/20.500.11850/154087/1/eth-7348-01.pdf

9. A Brief History of Sustainability, available at: https://thesustainableagency.com/blog/the-history-of-sustainability/#:~:text=In%201972%2C%20 sustainability%20was%20first,industrialized%20communities%2C%20among%20other%20suggestions

10. Purvis B., Mao Y., Robinson D. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins, available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s11625-018-0627-5

11. Knuth K. The term “resilience” is everywhere — but what does it really mean, available at: https://ensia.com/articles/what-is-resilience/

12. Six Key Factors for Achieving Sustainable Manufacturing, available at: https://www.foundrymag.com/opinion/article/21924600/six-key-factors-forachieving-sustainable-manufacturing