DOI: 10.33917/mic-4.117.2024.18-26

The author defines a development institution in relation to domestic realities, and also provides a brief overview of the world experience in the functioning of development institutions. The author points out that until recently, Russian development institutions demonstrated a low degree of efficiency, which necessitated reforms in the area under consideration. However, the reforms did not fully solve the assigned tasks, since the foreign policy situation changed dramatically. It is concluded that the basis for low efficiency is insufficient attention to the relationship between the concepts of «institute» and «institution». The author offers a list of activities that are key to improving the situation in the field of development institutions.

References:

1. Kostin K.B., Khomchenko E.A., Burmistrov A.N., Melikova E.F. Foreign direct investment and transnational corporations as potential factors of economic growth of states. Economic relations. 2021;11(4):633–664.

2. GE Global Innovation Barometer 2018. URL: https://www.ge.com/sites/default/files/GE_Global_Innovation_Barometer_2018-Summary_Report.pdf

3. Mapping 500+ Development Banks Qualification criteria, stylized facts and development trends. URL: https://financeincommon.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/mapping-development-banks.pdf

4. SWFI Total Asset Ratings. URL: https://www.swfinstitute.org/fund-rankings/development-bank

5. Kuzenkova V.M. Concepts of development institutions: a retrospective analysis. Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2020;17(1 (109)):40.

6. Monastyrsky E.A., Saklakov V.M. Classification of development institutions. Innovations. 2013;9 (179):65.

7. Sokolov A. Development institutions have failed innovations. Vedomosti, 02.03.2021. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2021/03/01/859742-instituti-razvitiya

8. Botoroeva E. The effectiveness of development institutions will be assessed by 10 indicators. URL: https://www.pnp.ru/economics/effektivnost-institutov-razvitiya-ocenyat-po-10-pokazatelyam.html

9. Skolkovo approved a new KPI system and indicators for 2024–2026. URL: https://ria.ru/20231225/skolkovo-1917898633.html

10. Petrov A.N., Varlamov K.V., Komarov A.V., Matveev D.A. Efficiency of development institutions. Shift in the paradigm of development institutions in the medium term. Economics of Science. 2017;3(4):234.

11. Putin called for support for development institutions that fell under sanctions. URL: https://360tv.ru/news/vlast/putin-prizval-podderzhat-instituty-razvitija-popavshie-pod-sanktsii/

12. Inshakov O.V. Institution and institution: problems of categorical differentiation and integration. Economic science of modern Russia. 2010;3(50):26–38.

13. Deming W. Edwards, Out of the Crisis, The MIT Press, 1994. 524 p.

14. Towards harmonized management and measurement of impact: The experience of development finance institutions. URL: https://one.oecd.org/document/DCD(2021)30/en/pdf

15. OECD-UNDP Impact Standards for Financing Sustainable DEVELOPMENT OECD, UNDP 2021.

At the beginning of the zero years of the XXI century there was a strong opposition of anti-globalists and globalists (mainstream) on the global agenda of development formed at the turn of the 1980-1990s in the XX century. In the middle of the second decade of the XXI century due to the green strategy of the global economy in relation to the new goals of sustainable development until 2030, these positions have shifted so much that the terms used do not reflect their original significance any more, which impedes the comprehension of actual processes, creating the illusion of radical changes in globalization processes in order to overcome negative trends on the way towards sustainable development. The article, on the basis of discussions on comprehending results of modern globalization a decade after its beginning, analyzes these changes and proposes terms more reflecting the essence of the ongoing global processes.

Modern innovative environment provides many opportunities for managing competitiveness of the national economy. Experience of managing competitiveness in the innovation environment seems useful in terms of studying the factors of innovative development and identifying promising directions of the national economy of the Republic of Belarus, in particular, the machine-building complex. As the objects of research, the author selected such countries as Korea, Japan, Thailand, China and Singapore.