DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.88-95

The state and municipal property management system is a set of agreed methods and means of targeted influence on the subjects of management process in order to achieve specified goals. The principle of maximizing the income received cannot be used as the basis for assessing the management of state and municipal proper ty objects due to the public nature of this category. In addition to the general principles of managing state and municipal proper ty inherent in the existing mixed economy, it is also necessary to take into account specific ones that meet the requirements of the transition period.

These include: compliance of the content and methods of management with the nature of reforms and, first and foremost, with ensuring progressive institutional shifts in the economy; focus of management on overcoming the systemic crisis of the economy and implementing its restructuring; compliance of organizational elements of management with the tasks of implementing industrial, investment, innovation and other policy areas.

References:

1. Rozhkov E.V. Ispol’zovanie zemli v granitsakh munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya kak polozhitel’nyy opyt upravleniya krupnym gorodom [Use of Land within the Boundaries of a Municipality as a Positive Experience in Managing a Large City]. Vestnik soveta molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Chelyabinskoy oblasti, 2022, vol. 1, no 1(36), pp. 69–75.

2. Bagaeva L.E., Kondratenko Z.K. Stanovlenie i reformirovanie zakonodatel’stva o privatizatsii munitsipal’nogo imushchestva [Formation and Reform of Legislation on the Privatization of Municipal Property]. Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoricheskie nauki. Yuridicheskie nauki, 2019, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 166–172, DOI: 10.30914/2411-3522-20195-2-166-172.

3. Akhmatova A.M., Lushinkova T.Yu. Bol’shaya privatizatsiya: tseli, zadachi, osobennosti realizatsii v rossiyskoy ekonomike [Large-scale Privatization: Goals, Objectives, Implementation Features in the Russian Economy]. Obshchestvo, ekonomika, upravlenie, 2018, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 10–16.

4. Mal’ginov G.N., Radygin A.D. Pervye itogi privatizatsionnoy programmy 2017–2019 gg. i osnovnye voprosy upravleniya gosudarstvennym imushchestvom [The First Results of the Privatization Program 2017–2019 and the Main Issues of State Property Management]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii, 2018, vol. 25, no 6, Iyun’ — iyul’, pp. 42–55.

5. Grigor’ev L.M., Kurdin A.A. Nereshennyy vopros legitimnosti chastnoy sobstvennosti v Rossii [The Unresolved Question of the Legitimacy of Private Property in Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2016, no 1, pp. 36–62.

6. Gengut Yu.L. Metodologiya statisticheskogo issledovaniya protsessov privatizatsii gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo imushchestva na territorii Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Methodology of Statistical Research of Privatization Processes of State and Municipal Property on the Territory of the Russian Federation]. Regional’noe razvitie: elektronnyy nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal, 2014, no 2, pp. 112–119.

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.108-115

The purpose of the study is to develop the bases of a methodology for compatibility of paradigms of society and its subsystems based on the compatibility of human needs and social values. The growing paradigmatic field of society is examined. The author studies expanded composition of the society subsystems based on the spheres of its life activity. He also defines and presents the compatibility of the society subsystems and the subsystems of an organization as a “unit” of society. A list of the main paradigms in the hierarchy of society subsystems is compiled. The role and significance of the methodology fundamentals for compatibility of the society paradigms are substantiated.

References:

1. Spenser G. Sotsial’naya statika [Social Statics]. Moscow, Yurayt, 2023, 424 p.

2. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Vol. 2. Samosoznanie evropeyskoy kul’tury XX veka [The Decline of Europe. Vol. 2. Self-awareness of the European Culture of the Twentieth Century]. Moscow, IPL, 1991.

3. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow, AST, 2020, 320 p.

4. Toynbi A. Issledovanie istorii. Vozniknovenie, rost i raspad tsivilizatsiy [A Study of History. The Emergence, Growth and Disintegration of Civilizations]. Moscow, AST: AST MOSKVA, 2009.

5. Bondarenko O.Ya. Sbornik dokladov po teorii i filosofii edinogo polya (Podgot. na osnove serii knig “Filosofiya Edinstva”) [Collection of Reports on the Theory and Philosophy of the Unified Field. (Podgot. based on the Book Series “Philosophy of Unit y”)]. Bishkek, 2000.

6. Deyl S. Tonkoe telo. Polnaya entsiklopediya bioenergeticheskoy meditsiny [The Thin Body. The Complete Encyclopedia of Bioenergetic Medicine]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2013.

7. Maslou A. Motivatsiya i lichnost’ [Motivation and Personalit y]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Piter, 2013, 351 p.

8. Berezina T.N. Rezervnye vozmozhnosti cheloveka [Human Reserve Capabilitie]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2000.

9. Morozov V.A. Sovmestimost’ sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem. Osnovy teorii sovmestimosti [Compatibility of Socio-economic Systems. Fundamentals of the Theory of Compatibility]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 2013.

10. Panov P.V. Instituty, identichnosti, praktiki: teoreticheskaya model’ politicheskogo poryadka [Institutions, Identities, Practices: a Theoretical Model of the Political Order]. Moscow, Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2011, 230 p.

11. Kleyner G.B. Strategiya predpriyatiya [Enterprise Strategy]. Moscow, Delo, 2008.

12. Morozov V.A. Obshchestvo i ekonomika vzaimodeystviya [Society and Economics of Interaction]. Monografiya. Vol. 2. Moscow, Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2017.

13. Morozov V.A. Dukhovnaya ekonomika i sovmestimost’ obshchestva. Teoriya sovmestimosti [Spiritual Economy and Compatibility of Society. Compatibility Theory]. Moscow, Izdatel’sko-torgovaya korporatsiya “Dashkov i K°”, 2021, DOI: 10.29030/978-5-394-04571-4-2021-5-577.

14. Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. N.Y., Oxford Universit y Press, 1996.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-5.94.2020.74-81

The scientific article assesses the innovative potential of enterprises in the retail and trade sector of the service sector in order to identify the level of their competitiveness. The modular categories are highlighted, according to which it is possible to identify the degree of readiness of enterprises for innovation. The algorithm for determining the innovative potential has been determined; the systemic components of the mesofractal of innovative potential were identified, and the methodology for assessing the readiness of an enterprise for innovation was improved, on the basis of which empirical indicators were obtained.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-5.94.2020.26-38

A study of the methodological and methodological aspects of managing economic processes allowed the authors to determine the basic conceptual principles for the formation of an energy strategy for the use of natural gas in industrial enterprises and distribute them into groups. This article presents the author’s classification of the system of principles for the formation of an energy-efficient strategy for using natural gas at an industrial enterprise, analyzes the principles considered on this issue, which allowed them to be combined into the following target groups: organizational, economic, financial, environmental, technological, methodological and specific. The authors propose, formulate and justify two new specific principles for the formation of an energy strategy: the risk principle of the energy strategy and the principle of reorganization of energy chains of natural gas consumption by an enterprise. For most of the principles presented, regression models have been developed for their quantitative assessment. Conclusions are made regarding the proposed classification of principles, according to which all principles are of equal importance in the implementation of the energy strategy and should be implemented and investigated simultaneously.

Constant transformation of the market economy, increasing globalization and competition are pushing the business to the evolution of approaches in management.