DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.110-111

The novel “Reconstruction” by journalist and musician Boris Igorevich Lifanovsky plunges into realit y, which, according to the author, “should remain in the past.”

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.88-95

The state and municipal property management system is a set of agreed methods and means of targeted influence on the subjects of management process in order to achieve specified goals. The principle of maximizing the income received cannot be used as the basis for assessing the management of state and municipal proper ty objects due to the public nature of this category. In addition to the general principles of managing state and municipal proper ty inherent in the existing mixed economy, it is also necessary to take into account specific ones that meet the requirements of the transition period.

These include: compliance of the content and methods of management with the nature of reforms and, first and foremost, with ensuring progressive institutional shifts in the economy; focus of management on overcoming the systemic crisis of the economy and implementing its restructuring; compliance of organizational elements of management with the tasks of implementing industrial, investment, innovation and other policy areas.

References:

1. Rozhkov E.V. Ispol’zovanie zemli v granitsakh munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya kak polozhitel’nyy opyt upravleniya krupnym gorodom [Use of Land within the Boundaries of a Municipality as a Positive Experience in Managing a Large City]. Vestnik soveta molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Chelyabinskoy oblasti, 2022, vol. 1, no 1(36), pp. 69–75.

2. Bagaeva L.E., Kondratenko Z.K. Stanovlenie i reformirovanie zakonodatel’stva o privatizatsii munitsipal’nogo imushchestva [Formation and Reform of Legislation on the Privatization of Municipal Property]. Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoricheskie nauki. Yuridicheskie nauki, 2019, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 166–172, DOI: 10.30914/2411-3522-20195-2-166-172.

3. Akhmatova A.M., Lushinkova T.Yu. Bol’shaya privatizatsiya: tseli, zadachi, osobennosti realizatsii v rossiyskoy ekonomike [Large-scale Privatization: Goals, Objectives, Implementation Features in the Russian Economy]. Obshchestvo, ekonomika, upravlenie, 2018, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 10–16.

4. Mal’ginov G.N., Radygin A.D. Pervye itogi privatizatsionnoy programmy 2017–2019 gg. i osnovnye voprosy upravleniya gosudarstvennym imushchestvom [The First Results of the Privatization Program 2017–2019 and the Main Issues of State Property Management]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii, 2018, vol. 25, no 6, Iyun’ — iyul’, pp. 42–55.

5. Grigor’ev L.M., Kurdin A.A. Nereshennyy vopros legitimnosti chastnoy sobstvennosti v Rossii [The Unresolved Question of the Legitimacy of Private Property in Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2016, no 1, pp. 36–62.

6. Gengut Yu.L. Metodologiya statisticheskogo issledovaniya protsessov privatizatsii gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo imushchestva na territorii Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Methodology of Statistical Research of Privatization Processes of State and Municipal Property on the Territory of the Russian Federation]. Regional’noe razvitie: elektronnyy nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal, 2014, no 2, pp. 112–119.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-3.116.2024.5-14

The recent campaign to seize large enterprises from private property based on appeals from the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation to the courts is causing a mixed reaction in the public consciousness. On the one hand, the people have long been yearning for a review of the results of privatization – unfair, unreasonable and criminal. On the other hand, the statute of limitations for challenging acts of privatization of state property in the 1990s. has long expired, and their abolition looks like an arbitrariness of law enforcement agencies, grossly trampling on basic property rights, which are considered the basis of the current economic structure. Let’s try to figure out if this is so.

References:

1. Civil Code of the Russian Federation dated November 30, 1994 No. 51-FZ (as amended on March 11, 2024). URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_5142/

2. Analysis of the processes of privatization of state property in the Russian Federation for the period 1993-2003. Report of the Accounts Chamber. M.: Olita Publishing House, 2004.

3. Kleiner G.B. Managing corporate enterprises in transition economies. Economic issues. 1999;8:64 (In Russ.).

4. Kleiner G.B. Enterprise strategy. M.: «Delo» ANKh Moscow. 2008. 528 p.

5. Ouchi U. Methods of organizing production. Japanese and American approaches (brief translation from English). M.: Economics. 1984.

6. Glazyev S. Chinese economic miracle. Lessons for Russia and the world. M.: Iz-vo «Ves Mir», 2023. 406 p.

7. Kleiner G.B., Khabibullin R.I., Dementyev V.E. and others. Collective forms of management in modern economics. M.: Publishing House «Scientific Library», 2017.

The following two lectures of the series on the role of State in the economy (see ES–2016, N 2, 3, 4) deal with Concepts of the founders of Marxism and their adepts respectively, in the pre-October 1917 and the post-October period on the directions, methods and goals of the State economic policy towards the building of so-called communist society. I identify the vector of economic thought in a separate section due to significant influence that Marxism and Leninism ideas had impinged on the Economics and Politics. A rising tide of interest in the Marxist ideas in some social strata and countries nowadays is due to a slowdown in the global economy and to the aggravation of socio-economic problems. The Marxist views analysis of the State’s attitude towards entrepreneurship is needed to identify the roots of the tragic events that occurred in the twentieth century, and which mark the centenary in 2017.