DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.103.2022.58-64

The article considers the issue of forming the optimal structure of assets of manufacturing enterprises according to the goals of their owners. An original approach is proposed to optimize the structure of the company’s assets according to the criterion of maximizing their effectiveness for owners through the enterprise capitalization indicator.

To link the indicators of capitalization and profit from the existing assets of manufacturing enterprises of the manufacturing industry, the authors propose to create a multiple regression model, where the independent variable is capitalization (profit), the dependent ones are indicators of specific assets.

After finding the contributions (regression coefficients) of each asset, we propose to form their structure according to the principle of a portfolio approach, in which the efficiency indicator of all assets will strive to the maximum and at the same time the specific features of the enterprise in each case will be taken into account [10].

References:

1. Azrilinyan A.N. Big Economic Dictionary. M.: Institute of New Economics, 1997. (In Russ.).

2. Bezpalov V.V., Dorofeev A.Yu., Gorin D.S., Marien L.S. Designing stages of anti-crisis organizational engineering of agricultural enterprises within the universal management cycle. Journal of Applied Research. 2021;1(4):22-35. (In Russ.).

3. Blazhevich O.G. Turnover indicators and their significance for assessing the efficiency of asset use // Scientific Bulletin: Finance, Banks, Investments. 2018;4 (45):31-38. (In Russ.).

4. Brigham Yu., Erhardt M. Financial management: St. Petersburg: Peter, 2009. (In Russ.).

5. Voloshchuk L.A., Tkachev S.I., Monina O.Yu. Statistics. Educational and practical manual: Saratov, 2016. (In Russ.).

6. Van Horn D., Vakhovich D. Fundamentals of Financial Management: M.: Dialectics, 2020. (In Russ.).

7. Dorofeev A.Yu., Filatov V.V., Medvedev V.M., Shestov A.V., Fadeev A.S. Methodology for calculating the discount rate using the capital asset valuation model. Online journal of Science Studies. 2015;7(2 (27)):18. (In Russ.).

8. Mukhidov R.H., Simonova V.A., Filatov V.V. Initial public offering of securities as a financial instrument of Russian corporations for attracting investments // Collection of scientific papers Actual issues of economics, commerce and service, Kosygin Russian State University, 2021. pp. 124-128. (In Russ.).

9. Samuelson P., Nordhaus U. Economics: M: Williams, 2018. (In Russ.).

10. Simonova V.A. Methods of optimization of technological assets of business processes of industrial enterprises // Transport business of Russia. 2010;5:68-71. (In Russ.).

11. Simonova V.A. Efficiency assessment and optimization of business processes of food industry enterprises // Economics, statistics and computer science. Bulletin of UMO. 2012;2:177-183. (In Russ.).

12. Simonova V.A., Tomm V.A. Normative values of financial coefficients as a basis for the formation of the balance sheet structure of industrial enterprises // Modern humanitarian studies. 2013;4 (53):29-34. (In Russ.).

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.103.2022.5-38

Monetary policy is the most important instrument of economic growth policy, but the influence of any instrument may weaken or strengthen over time. We will designate this state as the cumulative effect of monetary policy. The purpose of the study is to determine the cumulative effect of monetary policy, with the identification of the effectiveness of its measures in ensuring the growth of the Russian economy. The methodology of the study consists of monetary theory, structural analysis of the money supply, the principle of «goals-tools» of economic policy and correlation and regression analysis, which allow to identify the presence of the cumulative effect of monetary policy, to determine its impact on relevant macroeconomic goals: GDP growth and inflation.

The result of the study is the application of the introduced indicators of the sensitivity of macro-policy goals to monetary policy instruments, representing a picture of the weakening of the influence of monetary policy on the growth of the Russian economy. The increasing monetization was accompanied, in particular, by a decrease in the growth rate of the Russian economy, the unfolding of a recession, the consequences of which affect the dynamics of economic development, while maintaining a tight monetary policy option – with an increase in the key interest rate. The structural analysis of the money supply for the M2 aggregate made it possible to identify those components that, with an increase, slow down growth and reduce inflation, as well as to determine the closeness of the relationship of the interest rate with the changing components of the money supply. The assessment of the cumulative effect of monetary policy on two goals of macroeconomic development – growth and inflation, and two monetary policy instruments – the M2 money supply and the key interest rate, confirmed the existence of a negative cumulative effect of the policy for the growth goal and a positive cumulative effect on the inflation rate. For two purposes at once, the positive cumulative effect of monetary policy is confirmed only for the period 2016-2018 in the interval 2001-2020. Thus, monetary policy, firstly, ensured the containment of inflation out of connection with growth, and secondly, provided different cumulative effects for different purposes – due to the different sensitivity of the target to the instruments.

The prospect of the study is seen in the creation of some kind of aggregated indicator that would allow taking into account the overall impact on the dynamics of the entire set of monetary policy measures, and not separately by goals and instruments, as presented in this study.

References:

1.       Glazyev S.Yu. A leap into the future. Russia in new technological and world economic structures. Moscow: Knizhny Mir, 2018. 768 p. (In Russ.).

2.      Glazyev S.Yu. Lessons of the next Russian revolution: the collapse of a liberal utopia and a chance for an «economic miracle». Moscow: Publishing House «Ekonomicheskaya Gazeta», 2011. 576 p. (In Russ.).