DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.108.2023.67-73

Given the significant reserves and resources of natural gas, the potential for the development of the Russian economy at the present stage should be based mainly on the gas component of the fuel and energy balance. The article analyzes the state of reproduction of gas reserves in Russia and its rational use. The main trends in the development of the NGV market are considered, and the economic and environmental prospects for the use of compressed and liquefied natural gas as a NGV fuel are substantiated.

References:

1. State report «On the state and use of the mineral resource base of the Russian Federation in 2019». M.: MPR of Russia, 2020. 494 p.

2. State report «On the state and use of the mineral resource base of the Russian Federation in 2020». M.: MPR of Russia, 2021. 569 p.

3. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of April 15, 2014 No. 321 «Energy Development». – Access from the information and legal system «Garant».

4. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 02.03.2020 No. 221 «State Program of the Russian Federation «Development of Energy» as amended on 10.18.2022 No. 1855». – Access from the information and legal system «Garant».

5. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 18, 2021 No. 2352 «On Amendments to the State Program of the Russian Federation «Energy Development». – Access from the information and legal system «Garant».

6. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of April 28, 2018 N 831-r (as amended on February 22, 2019) «On approval of the Strategy for the development of the automotive industry of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025». – Access from the information and legal system «Garant».

7. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 05.13.2020 No. 669 «On Approval of the Rules for Providing Subsidies from the Federal Budget to Manufacturers of Equipment Using Natural Gas as Motor Fuel». – Access from the information and legal system «Garant».

8. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 29, 2021 No. 3052-r «Strategy for the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation with a low level of greenhouse gas emissions until 2050». – Access from the information and legal system «Garant».

9. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated February 13, 2021 No. 350-r «Action plan («Road map») for the development of the market for small-scale liquefied natural gas and gas motor fuel in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025». – Access from the information and legal system «Garant».

10. «Strategy for the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation with low greenhouse gas emissions until 2050» dated 10.29.2021 No. 3052-r. – Access from the information and legal system «Garant».

11. Energy Strategy of the Russian Federation until 2035 (approved by Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1523-r dated June 9, 2020). – Access from the information and legal system «Garant».

DOI: 10.33917/mic-3.104.2022.5-11

The work is devoted to the generalization of scientific methods and practical approaches for choosing an effective gas motorization policy. Domestic and foreign peculiarities of evaluating the economic efficiency of projects in the field of gas motor fuel are disclosed in detail. The author describes the assessment of the environmental and economic benefits of natural gas motor fuel based on the calculation of social costs, the cost-benefit analysis.

The conclusion is made about the insufficient development of the model of the functioning of the gas engine market, cooperation and competitive behavior of participants, methods for assessing its economic efficiency and commercial potential at the national level and the level of economic entities.

References:

1. IvanovA.V., KarpelE.M., SarkisovA.S.Strategicproblemsofusingnaturalgasasa motor fuel. M .: «Publishing House of the Russian State University of Oil and Gas named after.I.M. Gubkin», 2011. 94 p., ill.

2. Ivanov A.V., Karpel E.M., Sarkisov A.S.Evaluation of the corporate and economic (social) efficiency of projects for the sale of natural gas as a motor fuel in vehicles//Oil, gas and business. 2014;4:14-21.

3. Johnson C., Nobler E., Eudy L., Jeffers M. Financial analysis of battery electric transit buses. – National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States), 2020. №. NREL/TP-5400-74832.

4. Johnson С. Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Municipal Fleets. Technical Report NREL/TP-540-38843. 2006.

5. Karpel E.E., Zubareva V.D., Ivanov A.V. Methods for economic assessment of the effectiveness of gas industry development; Ed. V.D. Zubareva. M.: Oil and gas, 2000. 104 p.

6. Andreev A.F., Dunaev V.F., Zubareva V.D.Fundamentals of design analysis in the oil and gas industry. M.: UMTs of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation, 1997.

7. Barnitt R., K. Chandler L. Eudy 2006, New York City Transit Hybrid and CNG Transit Buses: Interim Evaluation Results, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report NREL/TP-540-38843.

8. Cohen J.T., Hammitt J.K., Levy J.I. Fuels for urban transit buses: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Environmental Science and Technology 37: 1477–1484. 2003.

9. Kuzina E.A.Updating the regulatory and technical base in the field of operation of gas-engine transport and equipment. Gas industry.2015;S3(728):94-95.

10. Makarova I.V., Khabibullin R.G., Valiev I.I., Gabsalikhova L.M.Transfer of vehicles to natural gas fuel: advantages, prospects, risks. Transport: science, technology, management.2014;1:52-55.

11. India Raises Profile of CNG for Transportation. URL: http://www.ngvglobal.com/blog/india-raises-profile-of-cng-for-transportation-0911.

12. Bagdasarov L.N. Advantages of natural gas as a motor fuel. Gas industry. 2017;10 (759):12-18.

13. Bukharov D.B. The economic effect of the conversion of municipal transport to gas motor fuel. Transport on alternative fuel. 2015;2 (44):37-40.

14. Velnikovsky A.A. Modeling of the infrastructure of automobile gas-filling compressor stations in St. Petersburg. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2017;4(63):201-204.