DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.114.2024.25-34

The article presents the genesis of the methodology for the study of the conceptual and categorical apparatus of microeconomics as a science before and after its separation from political economy. It is shown how, in the depths of traditional neoclassicism, new features of economic analysis based on the concept of a platform-type business are being formed – the irrelevant geographical location of primary links and economies of scale of demand. Based on the theoretical study of the platform business model, the manifestation of the basic category – digital reality – is justified. Based on the prevailing socio-economic processes, in which consumer behavior depends on the importance of digital platforms, the need to study consumer culture is explained. It is concluded that the platform business, which forms a new consumer culture, allows for a new revision of the methodology for setting and solving fundamental issues of economics.

References:

1. Arutyunova G.I., Sultygova A.A. Microeconomics in questions, tests, tasks and case problems, situations, Internet tasks. Moscow: MADI, 2014. (In Russ.).

2. Arutyunova, G.I., Sultygova A.A.  Economic theory in diagrams, tables and graphs. Part 1. Microeconomics: studies. manual. Moscow: MADI, 2014. 64 p. (In Russ.).

3. Kuntsman M.V., Sultygova A.A.   Theoretical concepts and methodological approaches to understanding the theory of production and cost analysis in the conditions of digitalization in microeconomics. Microeconomics. 2022;5:62-68. (In Russ.).

4. Vanin A. Dynamics of sales growth [Electronic resource]. URL: https://ru.investing.com/analysis/article-200298460?ysclid=lpca86zpya83839132

5. Grabova, O.N., Suglobov A.E. Digital property and new economic relations. Finance: Theory and Practice/ Finance: Theory and Practice. 2019;23(6):50-62.

6. Kondakova, A.V., Zolotukhina E.B.  Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of SaaS technology (software as a service) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-preimuschestv-i-nedostatkov

7. Sultygova A.A. Methodological recommendations for writing an essay on microeconomics. Moscow, 2013. (In Russ.).

8. Sultygova A.A. The subject of an essay on microeconomics. Moscow: MADI, 2014. (In Russ.).

9. Kuntsman M.V., Sultygova A.A.  The activity of cartels as a threat to economic security // Modern fundamental and applied research. 2015;4 (19):142-144. (In Russ.).

10. Kovalenko A.I. Network effect as a sign of the dominant position of digital platforms [Electronic resource]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/setevoy-effekt-kak-priznak-dominiruyuschego

DOI: 10.33917/mic-5.94.2020.18-25

In modern economic conditions, enterprises that produce high-tech products rely on their existing competencies based on various objects of intellectual property. In this regard, the competitiveness of high-tech enterprises is directly dependent on the efficiency of the use of intellectual property. Thus, there is a problem of constructing mechanisms that allow describing intellectual property objects of knowledge-intensive enterprise and performing their information analysis, which justifies the relevance of forming the organization’s intellectual property database.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.95.2020.21-29

This scientific article covers the issues of managing the cost of technologies and businesses based on knowledge, which means first of all the ability to assess the cost of such technologies and businesses, and then manage this cost in accordance with the goals defined by the relevant structures. Technologies and businesses based on knowledge belong to the objects of intellectual property.

The authors analyze modern methods of determining the value of property, including intellectual property; identify the peculiarities of assessing the value of a business based on knowledge; determine the features of managing this business; study and systematize the Russian experience of doing business based on knowledge.

DOI: 10.33917/es-5.163.2019.16-27

On the initiative of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) in the “Main areas of activity of the Government of the Russian Federation for the period until 2024”, approved by Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation D.A. Medvedev on September 29, 2018, a separate section was introduced to define a range of tasks covering all aspects of the development of intellectual property, the most important of which is to create a system of public services comfortable
for rightholders.

Authors propose a new idea of the economic theory construction as a more systematic and reasonable. The authors divide the economics into five levels: nanoeconomics, microeconomics, mezoeconomics, macroeconomics and megaeconomics. Nanoeconomics is considered as economics of intellectual capital, intellectual property and innovations. Nanoeconomics is the systemic basis for all other economics, ensuing from it by meaning and substance. In the article there is noted the increasing significance of legal factor in modern economic theory and practice and, in particular, the IP law importance.

Today the problems of efficient innovation development are in the spotlight of government bodies. Obviously, only in this way it is possible to succeed in improving the national economy competitiveness in the medium and especially in the long term. This understanding was formed as a result of evaluating the existing resource constraints, consequences and prospects of wide spread of information and computer technologies, biotechnology, alternative energy sources, automation of production processes and so on. It has become even more prominent on the background of the global financial crisis, hardly predictable high volatility in commodity markets and environmental problems aggravation caused by the use of technologies hostile to environment.

The paper investigated the current state of innovation system in France. By the example of the Higher School of Engineering École Polytechnique it considers formation of technology transfer center as a link between university innovation activity and entrepreneurial activity of major national corporations in France. The article examines principles of interaction between the major players of the university innovation system and their role in supporting small innovative companies formed as a result of the university innovative activity.

The article deals with the current state of innovation system in Israel. The article presents approaches of the Israeli innovation system major players to the issue of technology transfer and innovation support. The paper considers the Israeli government policy aimed at the innovations commercialization support by the example of the Weizmann Institute.

The value of patent information for innovation activity is well known: the invention is not born in an information vacuum and represents a step from the achieved level of technology. This step can be huge, and more modest in its significance, but both, being implemented, generate innovation.