DOI: 10.33917/es-4.196.2024.128-136

The article explores mechanisms for increasing resilience and sustainability of commercial organizations in conditions of growing instability of the external environment. Approaches to understanding viability, sustainability and adaptability of an organization are analyzed. The concept of managerial cross-section is introduced. Among the highlighted sections, the authors examine in more details the tools for studying a communication aspect. Advantages of subject-oriented management for designing communications in an organization are described, some risks of implementing the proposed strategy are identified. Relevance of the study is determined by parameters and trends of change in the modern market environment, which really necessitate to strengthen the dynamics of renewal and adaptation processes, since acceleration of technological innovation is not accompanied by adequate and comparable development of management models. Results obtained can be applied for theoretical research into the functioning of sociotechnical systems of different scales. Also, the proposed approach can be put into practice as part of the development of measures aimed at transforming the company’s business model or improving the efficiency of operational management.

References:

1. Lavrikova Yu.G., Buchinskaya O.N., Myslyakova Yu.G. Teoriya khaosa: rasshirenie granits ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy [Chaos Theory: Expanding the Frontiers of Economic Research]. AlterEconomics, 2023, vol. 20, no 1, pp. 79–109, DOI: 10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-1.5

2. Abramov V.I., Churkin D.A. Otsenka urovnya zrelosti sistemy upravleniya vzaimootnosheniyami s klientami [Assessing the Maturity Level of a Customer Relationship Management System]. Vestnik universiteta, 2022, no 12, pp, 5–13.

3. Pratt M., Kakula S. Motivatsiya v kommercheskoy kompanii s ispol’zovaniem kommunikatsiy, osnovannykh na tekhnologiyakh: V kn.: Dingli A., Khaddod F. Iskusstvennyy intellekt v Industrii 4.0. Issledovaniya v oblasti vychislitel’nogo intellekta [Motivation in a Commercial Company Using Technology-based Communications: In: Dingli A., Haddod F. Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0. Research in Computational Intelligence]. Springer, 2021, vol. 928, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61045-6_2 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-61045-6_2

4. Abramov V.I., Abramov I.V., Polivanov K.V., Semenkov K.Yu. Kontseptual’naya mode’’ tsifrovoy sistemy analiticheskoy podderzhki distantsionnogo upravleniya personalom organizatsii [Conceptual Model of a Digital System of Analytical Support for Remote Management of an Organization’s Personnel]. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i pravo, 2023, vol. 13, vol. 7, pp. 2341–2352, DOI: 10.18334/epp.13.7.118326.

5. Romanova O.A., Sirotin D.V., Ponomareva A.O. Ot ekonomiki soprotivleniya — k rezil’entnoy ekonomike (na primere promyshlennogo regiona) [From the Economy of Resistance to the Resilient Economy (Using the Example of an Industrial Region)]. AlterEconomics, 2022, vol. 19, no 4, pp. 620–637, DOI: 10.31063/AlterEconomics/2022.19-4.4

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.116-123

The author of the article analyzes trends in the development of innovation activity from 2005 to 2021 in the six largest urban agglomerations of Russia — Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nizhny Novgorod, Kazan, Yekaterinburg and Novosibirsk. As a result of the study, it was determined that in order to further realize the innovative potential of the largest urban agglomerations as sources of economic growth of the country, it is necessary to finance and support industries engaged in innovative types of economic activities, develop mechanisms for integrating science and business, build and develop inter-agglomeration (interregional) connections and cooperation in scientific-technological development.

References:

1. Aganbegyan A.G. O prioritetnom razvitii sfery ekonomiki znaniy [On the Priority Development of the Knowledge Economy Sphere]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, 2021, no 1(67), pp. 15–22, DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2021-1-67-15-22

2. Ushvitskiy L.I., Ter-Grigor’yants A.A., Rebiy A.P. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya innovatsionnykh protsessov v rossiyskoy ekonomike [Modern Trends in the Development of Innovation Processes in the Russian Economy]. Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo federal’nogo universiteta, 2017, no 2(59), pp. 120–128.

3. Shamina L.K. Vliyanie ekonomicheskoy kon”yunktury na innovatsionnuyu aktivnost’ otechestvennykh predpriyatiy [Influence of the Economic Situation on the Innovation Activity of Domestic Enterprises]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, 2021, no 4(70), pp. 147–155, DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.37930/1990-9780-2021-4-70-147-155

4. Kochetkov S.V., Kochetkova O.V. Innovatsionnoe sostoyanie ekonomiki regiona kak glavnoe uslovie snizheniya mezhterritorial’nogo neravenstva [Innovative State of the Regional Economy as the Main Condition for Reducing Interterritorial Inequality]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, 2023, no 1(75), pp. 50–55, DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2023-1-75-50-55

5. Mikhaylov A.S., Kuznetsova T.Yu., Peker I.Yu. Tipologiya regionov po ikh funktsional’noy roli v innovatsionnom prostranstve Rossii [Typology of Regions According to their Functional Role in the Innovation Space of Russia]. Regional’nye issledovaniya, 2019, no 4, pp. 46–57, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2019-4-4

6. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 13 fevralya 2019 g. N 207-r “Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2025 goda” [Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of February 13, 2019 No. 207-r “Strategy for spatial development of the Russian Federation

for the period until 2025”], available at: http://static.government.ru/media/files/UVAlqUtT08o60RktoOXl22JjAe7irNxc.pdf

7. Regiony Rossii. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli. 2022: Stat. sb. [Regions of Russia. Socio-economic Indicators. 2022: Statistical Book]. Moscow, Rosstat, 2022, 1122 p., available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Region_Pokaz_2022.pdf

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.168.2020.64-71

The article examines the state of innovative activity in Russia on the basis of the most significant indicators (federal budget spending on science, number of advanced technologies created, training of scientific personnel, effectiveness of new research, etc.), dynamics of innovative development in the Russian scientific and technical sphere over the past 25 years is analyzed. It is noted that with an acute shortage of budgetary funds, labor, investment, material and technical resources and other development factors, it is necessary to take new decisions on priorities for developing all life support spheres, taking into account the continuing threats of extension and possible tightening of international sanctions

The article considers the factors and the structure of demand for the Russian enterprises innovation product in two aspects: innovative resources and technology and the product manufactured with their help. The article assesses the level of innovation activity, identifies trends and problems. It also offers comparison of innovation demand importance by Russia and the Perm region.