DOI: 10.33917/mic-5.118.2024.14-25

Artificial intelligence and natural intelligence are two types of intelligence coexist in the world today. Despite the artificial intelligence is still little studied, it is changing all areas of human activity. It is a universal tool allows people to rethink how we integrate information, analyze data, and use insights to improve decision-making. The study analyzes areas where artificial intelligence and natural intelligence are unique. It also reveals the artificial intelligence positive value for natural intelligence. Artificial intelligence algorithms are not like passive machines capable of mechanical or predetermined responses. It combines information from different sources, instantly analyzes the material and displays information results obtained from the data. Data form can vary and may be as digital information, satellite imagery, visual information, text or unstructured data. Due to massive improvements in storage systems, processing speed, and analytical techniques, artificial intelligence is capable of incredibly complex analysis. The article identifies the main differences and similarities in the artificial and natural intelligence characteristics, as well as the exceptional capabilities of these concepts. Despite the natural intelligence is endowed with a creative component that nothing can supplant so far, artificial intelligence is already changing the world and raising important issues for the social, economic and political spheres. Artificial intelligence acts as an assistant to natural intelligence. Artificial intelligence is not a futuristic concept, but rather something that exists today, being integrated and implemented in various sectors. This includes areas such as finance, national security, healthcare, litigation, transportation, construction, and industry. There are many examples of how AI is already making an impact on the world and significantly expanding human capabilities.

References:

1. Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason / Translated from German by N. Lossky, verified and edited by Ts.G. Arzakanyan and M.I. Itkin, note by Ts.G. Arzakanyan. Moscow: Mysl, 1994. 591 p.

2. Osipov G.S., Velichkovsky B.M. Artificial Intelligence. The Great Russian Encyclopedia 2004–2017. URL: https://old.bigenc.ru/mathematics/text/2022537?ysclid=lxnb09fze448915724

3. Bridges A., Royka A., Wilson T. et al. Bumblebees Socially Learn Behavior Too Complex to Innovate Alone. Nature. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07126-4

4. Marx K., Engels F. Works. v. 46, part 2. 652 p.

5. Kozlowski P. Postmodern Culture: Social and Cultural Consequences of Technical Development: Transl. from Germ. 1997. 240 p.

6. Lepskiy V.E. Artificial Intelligence in Subjective Management Paradigms. Philosophical Sciences. 2021;64(1):88–101.

7. Glukhikh V.A., Eliseev S.M., Kirsanova N.P. Artificial Intelligence as a Problem of Modern Sociology. DISCOURSE. 2022;8(1):82–93.

8. Belikova E.K. Popov E.A. Modern problems of the relationship between natural and artificial intelligence in the paradigm of culture. Social problems of society development. Sociology of culture. 2023;11: 9–13.

DOI: 10.33917/es-7.173.2020.110-117

The article analyzes a special type of unemployment, the occurrence of which is associated with the development of the digital economy. Shown are the main problems that digital can bring to social life and the fate of an individual worker. Chief among these problems is that with the further digital transformation of the economy, more and more jobs may be threatened with extinction, and the disappearance of old jobs this time will not be accompanied by the emergence of new ones. A situation may arise when workers released due to digitalization will become not only unemployed, but also generally inoperable. A global question arises — what to do with those who do not work, and how to support them? It also examines the related measures of population regulation and global mechanisms for managing demographic processes.

The paper analyzes the crowdsourcing possibilities in predicting the future and developing solutions. The author distinguishes types of crowdsourcing, discusses its psychological characteristics in comparison with the other methods of knowledge management. He discusses cognitive and motivational mechanisms limiting the effectiveness of crowdsourcing as a form of collective intelligence.

The article is an expanded alternative version of the document presented in 2011 at the conference on David Boje’s contribution into organizational studies and especially the Boje’s concept of ante-narratives (stories about the past). The main focus of this article is the overlay of stories about the past on the organizational grammars spectrum.

Each object of Being, including thinking, determines links that it creates to other objects and at the same time is determined by them. From their number and nature depends, in particular, the possibility of the object development (structuring), including the discovery, having the character of bifurcations.

Approaches to the nature of creativity are divided into materialistic ones and not quite. In the present article the author pays tribute to the materialist conception.

The notion of “taste”, artistic, aesthetic, which is unfortunately ignored by the national pedagogy, is highly valued in gymnasium.

Society is sure that there are no innocent in the world. Great book of all the times – the Bible – confirms this. But, as we know, there are exceptions …

Today one stage is not enough for a talented artist. He wants to exhibit himself on different stages, in the cinema, to work with different directors, and it is only for the benefit of art.