DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.107.2022.32-42

The article analyzes network interactions as a factor in the formation of business value in the digital economy. In the course of the study, the author analyzes the advantages and features of network interactions within platform business models and business ecosystems. The author comes to the following conclusions. Network interactions between platform participants produce network effects. Taking advantage of network effects is changing the way business value is created. Data is becoming the main asset that ensures the growth of the capitalization of digital companies. Links of the value chain are transformed into modules and embedded in networks. Under the influence of digital technologies, business value is created at all levels of the economic system (including the nanolevel), companies are turning from static hierarchical structures into dynamic networks of interconnected players, and the role of company management in creating business value is changing.

References:

1. Lenin V.I. Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism. Full coll. op. Moscow: Publishing house of political literature, 1973. T. 27. pp. 299–426.

2. Galbraith J.K. New industrial society. Favorites. Moscow: Eksmo, 2008. 1200 p.

3. Best M. New competition. Institutes of industrial development. Moscow: TEIS, 2002. 356 p.

4. Porter M. Japanese economic model: Can Japan compete? / M. Porter, H. Takeuchi, M. Sakakibara; Per. from English. Moscow: Albina Business Books, 2005. 262 p.

5. Belyaeva I.Yu. Capital of financial and industrial corporate structures: theory and practice / I. Yu. Belyaeva, M. A. Eskindarov. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2001. 399 p.

6. Eskindarov M.A. Development of corporate relations in the modern Russian economy. Moscow: Respublika, 1999. 366 p.

 7. Granovetter M. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness // American Journal of Sociology. 1985;91. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780199?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

8. Granovetter M. Economic institutions as social constructors // Journal of sociology and social anthropology. 2004;8(1):77-80. (In Russ).

9. Ananyin O.I., Odintsova M.I. Methodology of economic science: modern problems and trends // Sources, Vol. 4. Moscow: IE RAN, 2000, pp. 135-136.

10. Williamson O.I. Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, “Relational” Contracting / Scientific Editing and Introductory Article by V.S. Katkalo; per. from English. Yu.V. Blagov, V.S. Katkalo, D.S. Slavnova, Yu.V. Fedotova, N.N. Tsytovich. St. Petersburg: Lenizdat; CEV Press, 1996. 702 p.

11. Oleinik A. Model of network capitalism // Questions of Economics. 2003;8:132–149. (In Russ.).

12. New post-industrial wave of the West. Anthology / Ed. V.L. Inozemtseva. Moscow: Academia, 1999. 640 p.

13. Kats M.L. Network externalities, competition and compatibility / M.L. Katz, K. Shapiro // Milestones of economic thought. T. 5. Theory of industrial markets / Ed. A.G. Slutsky. St. Petersburg: School of Economics, 2003. pp. 500–535.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.103.2022.58-64

The article considers the issue of forming the optimal structure of assets of manufacturing enterprises according to the goals of their owners. An original approach is proposed to optimize the structure of the company’s assets according to the criterion of maximizing their effectiveness for owners through the enterprise capitalization indicator.

To link the indicators of capitalization and profit from the existing assets of manufacturing enterprises of the manufacturing industry, the authors propose to create a multiple regression model, where the independent variable is capitalization (profit), the dependent ones are indicators of specific assets.

After finding the contributions (regression coefficients) of each asset, we propose to form their structure according to the principle of a portfolio approach, in which the efficiency indicator of all assets will strive to the maximum and at the same time the specific features of the enterprise in each case will be taken into account [10].

References:

1. Azrilinyan A.N. Big Economic Dictionary. M.: Institute of New Economics, 1997. (In Russ.).

2. Bezpalov V.V., Dorofeev A.Yu., Gorin D.S., Marien L.S. Designing stages of anti-crisis organizational engineering of agricultural enterprises within the universal management cycle. Journal of Applied Research. 2021;1(4):22-35. (In Russ.).

3. Blazhevich O.G. Turnover indicators and their significance for assessing the efficiency of asset use // Scientific Bulletin: Finance, Banks, Investments. 2018;4 (45):31-38. (In Russ.).

4. Brigham Yu., Erhardt M. Financial management: St. Petersburg: Peter, 2009. (In Russ.).

5. Voloshchuk L.A., Tkachev S.I., Monina O.Yu. Statistics. Educational and practical manual: Saratov, 2016. (In Russ.).

6. Van Horn D., Vakhovich D. Fundamentals of Financial Management: M.: Dialectics, 2020. (In Russ.).

7. Dorofeev A.Yu., Filatov V.V., Medvedev V.M., Shestov A.V., Fadeev A.S. Methodology for calculating the discount rate using the capital asset valuation model. Online journal of Science Studies. 2015;7(2 (27)):18. (In Russ.).

8. Mukhidov R.H., Simonova V.A., Filatov V.V. Initial public offering of securities as a financial instrument of Russian corporations for attracting investments // Collection of scientific papers Actual issues of economics, commerce and service, Kosygin Russian State University, 2021. pp. 124-128. (In Russ.).

9. Samuelson P., Nordhaus U. Economics: M: Williams, 2018. (In Russ.).

10. Simonova V.A. Methods of optimization of technological assets of business processes of industrial enterprises // Transport business of Russia. 2010;5:68-71. (In Russ.).

11. Simonova V.A. Efficiency assessment and optimization of business processes of food industry enterprises // Economics, statistics and computer science. Bulletin of UMO. 2012;2:177-183. (In Russ.).

12. Simonova V.A., Tomm V.A. Normative values of financial coefficients as a basis for the formation of the balance sheet structure of industrial enterprises // Modern humanitarian studies. 2013;4 (53):29-34. (In Russ.).

The article considers the features of the impact of integration on the capitalization of companies in the conditions of the development of the energy market of the Russian Federation. The essence of integration processes in modern market conditions is considered. The relationship between the integration of domestic companies and the level of their capitalization is determined. The influence of integration on the capitalization of companies in the context of the development of the Russian energy market is substantiated. The most effective directions of using the mechanisms of the influence of integration on the capitalization of companies in the context of the development of the energy market of the Russian Federation are shown.

DOI: 10.33917/es-3.169.2020.134-141

The article dwells on the topic of competition between coal and solar energy as types of fuel. The authors provide a comparison of the installed capacity of a virtual solar power station and an existing coal power station located within the land allotment of a coal mine. The development prospects of the coal industry in terms of thermal coal are shown.